Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

This is a Study to Investigate the Effects and Safety of Codabakalner for the Treatment of Fragile X Syndrome in Male Participants and Adult Participants with Autism Spectrum Disorders

The present study will be performed to evaluate the effectiveness of peer modeling and audiovisual peer modeling video on toothbrushing skills in comparison to the visual pedagogical method at home. To monitor the improvement of teeth brushing skills in children with ASD using plaque and gingival indices.

Background: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation that has aroused increased interests in the past decade. Not only that it is transient with little side-effects, and can be well-tolerated by children, it is also affordable and readily accessible, making it an appealing treatment option for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Objective: (1) To evaluate the therapeutic effects of tDCS on improving cognitive function in patients with ASD, (2) to better understand the neural mechanisms underlying the neuromodulation effects of tDCS in patients with ASD, and (3) to determine whether resting-state functional connectivity measures can predict the therapeutic effects of active tDCS in individuals with ASD. Methods: To assess the therapeutic effects and neural mechanisms of tDCS, 90 adolescents with ASD (age 12-22 years) will receive three stimulation conditions: cathodal tDCS of the left DLPFC, anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC and sham-tDCS with at least a week apart each time. During the active tDCS or sham-tDCS condition, the participants will be administered a computerized test battery (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, CANTAB®) to evaluate their cognitive function. EEG before and after the tDCS to evaluate the tDCS-induced alteration in their neural activity and functional connectivity. Hypothesis: Drawing together the different evidence linking ASD with cortical hyper-excitability and disordered neural connectivity, as reviewed previously, the investigators hypothesize that, relative to a sham-tDCS condition, active cathodal (inhibitory) and anodal (excitatory) tDCS over the left DLPRC will induce stimulation-linked facilitation of learning and resultant improvement of cognitive functioning in patients with ASD. In addition to the therapeutic effects of tDCS, enhanced neural connectivity, as indexed by altered level EEG theta coherence in patients with ASD, will mediate the beneficial effects of tDCS, relative to sham tDCS, on improvements in cognitive function. Moreover, resting-state functional connectivity will moderate the beneficial effects of active tDCS on cognitive function, relative to sham tDCS, such that participants with greater pre-treatment resting state functional connectively will evidence greater/less response to tDCS, relative to participants receiving sham tDCS.

The goal of this clinical study is to learn whether Neuromotor Task Training (NTT) may help improve functional motor skills in autistic children who have motor difficulties. The main question it aims to answer is: Does Neuromotor Task Training help autistic children improve a motor skill that is difficult for them in daily life? This study will include autistic children with motor difficulties. Each child will work on one functional motor skill chosen according to their needs and daily-life goals. Examples may include skills such as catching a ball, jumping rope, putting on a coat, or another meaningful motor task. Participants will take part in an initial assessment of their motor abilities. They will then choose, with their family and the researcher, a functional motor skill to work on. The selected skill will be assessed repeatedly before, during, and after the training period. Participants will receive Neuromotor Task Training sessions focused on this skill. They will also be followed after the training period to see whether the motor skill is maintained. Neuromotor Task Training is a task-oriented rehabilitation approach. It focuses on practicing meaningful motor skills in conditions that are progressively adapted to the child. The task, the environment, and the feedback provided by the therapist may be adjusted during the sessions to support motor learning. This study uses a single-case experimental design. This means that each participant's progress is measured repeatedly over time. The researchers will examine whether motor performance changes after the start of the training and whether these changes are maintained after the training period.

This clinical study aims to evaluate whether a nasal spray containing exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSC-EXOs) can safely and effectively improve core symptoms in children aged 3-7 years with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). It is a 24-week, non-randomized, controlled, open-label trial. Sixty pediatric patients with ASD will be non-randomly assigned at a 1:2 ratio to two groups: a no-intervention control group and an active exosome nasal spray treatment group. The treatment group will receive the nasal spray every other day, totaling 10 administrations throughout the study. The no-intervention control group will receive no experimental treatment but will undergo the same assessments and safety checks with the treatment group. This design aims to monitor the safety and efficacy of the hUC-MSC-EXOs nasal spray.

This 12-month study tests whether AdiaVita (umbilical cord blood-derived stem cells and exosomes) plus glutathione improves autism symptoms more than glutathione alone in children ages 3-12. About 100 children with confirmed autism will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives monthly IV AdiaVita plus IV glutathione for 3 months. The other group receives IV glutathione plus a saline placebo infusion for 2 months. Both groups also use a topical glutathione spray twice a day at home. Symptoms are tracked with the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC), completed by a parent and by a therapist or teacher. Safety is monitored at clinic visits through Month 12. Children who first receive glutathione only, may crossover to receive AdiaVita at no extra cost if they stay medically stable and their family agrees. Participation is voluntary. The study fee is $12,000.

Interventions for parents of children with NDD face two pivotal challenges. Firstly, many overlook the consequential influence of parenting stress, symptoms of parental anxiety and depression on the well-being of parent-child dyads. Though some address parenting stress, they fall short of considering comprehensive health outcomes. Secondly, current evidence has supported ACT as an empirically validated, transdiagnostic psychotherapeutic intervention for parents with dual benefits for the parent-child dyads, but the treatment delivery (e.g., group-based and guided online approaches) is primarily in-person, demanding the presence of expert personnel in every session, limiting its scalability and accessibility. Unlike other psychotherapies like CBT and mindfulness, conventional ACT sessions often adopt a 'one-size-fits-all' strategy, using standardised and pre-packed exercises lacking the personalisation necessary to address individual variations in psychological inflexibility. Leveraging our available innovation, Pai.ACT, an AI-driven chatbot adopting the Focused ACT approach, seeks to offer personalised and scalable mental health solutions for Chinese-speaking parents of NDD children. With our encouraging preliminary data supporting our pre-trained NLP model's accuracy and Pai.ACT's feasibility, the investigators propose to examine Pai.ACT in a full-scale clinical trial. The study will examine the following research questions: 1. Is Pai.ACT more effective than positive parenting advice for reducing parenting stress (primary outcome for parents) of parents and the emotional and behavioural symptoms of their young children with NDD (primary outcome for children) over the 12-month post-intervention follow-up? 2. Is Pai.ACT more effective than positive parenting advice for reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety, improving parental psychological flexibility and parenting behaviour over the 12-month post-intervention follow-up? 3. Is Pai.ACT more effective than positive parenting advice for reducing the use of healthcare and rehabilitation services in children with NDD over the 12-month post-intervention follow-up? 4. What are the perceived benefits, satisfaction, strengths, and limitations of Pai.ACT from the parents' perspectives?

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in children with obesity, with and without autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and examine how fitness relates to body measurements, body composition, and cardiometabolic health. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Do children with and without ASD differ in cardiorespiratory fitness and handgrip strength? * Are fitness levels related to body composition and measures of cardiometabolic health? Researchers will compare children with ASD to children without ASD to see if there are differences in fitness, body composition, and cardiometabolic health. Participants will have information from their medical records reviewed, including: * Cardiorespiratory fitness and handgrip strength test results * Height, weight, BMI, and body composition measurements * Blood test results, including HbA1c and cholesterol levels * Age, sex, and other demographic information

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Dance Movement Therapy (DMT) in improving social play, emotional regulation, group skills, and communication skills among students with mild autism in China. The study will use a cluster randomized controlled trial with a pretest-posttest design. A total of 96 students aged 8-13 years will be recruited from special education schools in Linfen, Shanxi Province, China. Existing intact classes will serve as clusters and will be randomly assigned to either the DMT group or the Regular Art Class (RAC) control group. Both groups will participate in 12 weeks of intervention, conducted twice weekly, with each session lasting 45 minutes during regular art class time. Outcomes will be assessed before and after the intervention to evaluate and compare changes between the two groups.

The main goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness, benefits, and post-treatment persistence of an intervention for loudness hyperacusis in adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the intervention increase loudness tolerance * Does the intervention reduce symptoms related to loudness hyperacusis Researchers will compare measures related to loudness hyperacusis before, during, and after the intervention. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned to either one of two groups. One group will receiver the intervention immediately. This group will be evaluated during the 6-month intervention and evaluated for 6 months after the end of the intervention. The other group will be evaluated for 6 months before the intervention and during the 6-month intervention. * Visit the test site once every month over the course of a year for evaluation and intervention activities * Keep a diary of their symptoms and the number of hours per day they engage in the intervention

Schools serve a large number of autistic children, yet face two critical gaps that stifle the delivery of evidence-based practices: 1) an intervention gap characterized by limited availability of evidence-based practices educators can use to address externalizing behaviors when they occur in the classroom; and 2) an implementation gap consisting of insufficient evidence-based practice fidelity and sustainment over time. To address these gaps, this project proposes a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial that simultaneously tests: 1) the clinical effectiveness of an efficient, educator-delivered clinical intervention to reduce autistic children's externalizing behaviors (Research Units in Behavioral Interventions in Educational Settings; RUBIES), and 2) the implementation effectiveness of an organizational implementation strategy designed specifically to enhance sustainment of evidence-based practices in public schools (Helping Educational Leaders Mobilize evidence; HELM). Consistent with the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)'s experimental therapeutics approach, the project also examines the mechanisms through which RUBIES impacts clinical outcomes and through which HELM influences implementation outcomes. The proposed study directly responds to high priority research areas of the US Department of Health and Human Services Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee's Strategic Plan for Autism Research, which calls for expanded research on the translation of proven-efficacious interventions into the community, NIMH Strategic Priority 3.3 to test interventions for effectiveness in community practice settings, and NIMH Strategic Priority 4.2 to expedite adoption, sustained implementation, and continuous improvement of evidence-based mental health services. If successful, this study will have substantial public health impact because it will produce an effective intervention for a prevalent problem among a high impact population in schools across the United States of America and will determine how to sustain this (and other) intervention(s) with high fidelity, to the betterment of health.

This study will examine whether visiting the National Taiwan Museum can support the social and emotional well-being of autistic adults. The research team plans to recruit 90 autistic adults aged 18 to 50 from the Department of Psychiatry at National Taiwan University Hospital. Participants must have average-range intellectual ability and be able and willing to complete the study activities and assessments. People with serious physical or mental health conditions that would prevent full participation will not be included. Participants must also agree to audio and video recording during the activities. After an outpatient doctor confirms eligibility, participants will complete questionnaires and choose one of three museum participation options: 1. Visit the museum once independently. 2. Join five guided museum visits with group discussions. 3. Invite a friend to visit the museum together. Each group will include about 30 participants. For the guided group, each session will last about 90 minutes and include a professional museum tour, a question-and-answer period, time for independent exploration, and a group discussion. Participants will be encouraged to select exhibits that interest them, record their observations, share their thoughts, listen to others, and respond to different viewpoints. The five planned museum themes include Taiwan's history and identity, relationships between people and nature, architecture and living spaces, human evolution and the future, and attitudes toward money and financial planning. The discussions will explore everyday topics such as stereotypes, personal values, preferred living environments, hopes for the future, and managing money. Participants will complete questionnaires before and after the program. These questionnaires will assess areas such as autistic characteristics, social communication, empathy, sensory experiences, comfort with social touch, emotional skills, loneliness, anxiety, depression, and anxiety during social interaction. Participants will also rate how enjoyable, comfortable, safe, interesting, and socially engaging they found the museum activities. The researchers will compare participants' results before and after the program. They will also compare the three participation options to determine whether independent visits, guided group activities, or visiting with a friend produce different outcomes. The overall goal is to understand whether museum-based activities can be used as a form of social prescribing to improve social participation, emotional well-being, confidence, and quality of life among autistic adults.

The goal of this study is to learn if a dance, yoga, and mindful movement program can improve the lives of adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). ASD is a condition that can affect how a person communicates, connects with others, and experiences daily life. This study focuses on adults ages 18 to 35. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can a dance, yoga, and mindful movement program improve social skills and communication for adults with ASD? * Can it improve their quality of life and sense of well-being? * Can it improve their physical, mental, and emotional health? Dance, yoga, and mindful movement have been studied in children with ASD, but very little research has looked at how they may help adults. This study hopes to help fill that gap. Participants will: * Take part in a 12-week dance, yoga, and mindful movement program * Answer survey questions at the start and end of the program about their social skills, communication, quality of life, well-being, and overall health

7q11.23 duplication syndrome (7q duplication syndrome/7DUP) is caused by a microduplication of the 7q11.23 chromosomal region, encompassing 26-28 genes, including the GTF2I gene. This syndrome, often considered as a "mirror" phenotype of Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS), is characterized by a wide range of neurodevelopmental impairments, including a neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD), autism spectrum disorders (ASD), selective mutism, mild dysmorphic features, and aortic dilation. Notably, one of the core clinical features of 7DUP is socialization impairment, which varies in severity across individuals. The GTF2I gene, identified as critical in the pathogenesis of both WBS and 7DUP, exhibits opposite expression patterns in the two syndromes, with reduced expression in WBS and overexpression in 7DUP. The gene's dysregulation in 7DUP plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of the associated NDD and social deficits. Despite progress in characterizing the genetic underpinnings of 7DUP, there remains a critical gap in understanding the developmental trajectory of socialization impairments in affected individuals, especially during their transition through different developmental stages, from early childhood to adulthood. Recent advancements in the study of neuronal models derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and brain organoids have shed light on the molecular mechanisms driving 7DUP-related NDDs. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDAC inhibitors), which have been widely used in oncology, have shown promising preliminary results in reducing abnormal GTF2I expression in glutamatergic neurons differentiated from 7DUP patient-derived iPSCs. Preclinical studies in mouse models further demonstrated that these drugs can ameliorate socialization deficits, highlighting their therapeutic potential in addressing the core neurodevelopmental challenges in 7DUP. However, despite these advancements, no longitudinal clinical studies have characterized the developmental trajectory of socialization impairments in 7DUP patients. Understanding this trajectory is critical, as it can inform the timing and potential impact of therapeutic interventions, such as HDAC inhibitors. Given the complexity and variability of the 7DUP phenotype, a comprehensive clinical characterization of socialization impairments across the lifespan is essential to improve diagnostic accuracy, optimize intervention strategies, and ultimately improve patient outcomes. The aim of this research is to characterize the developmental trajectory of socialization impairments in patients with 7DUP, from early childhood through adulthood. By identifying patterns of socialization difficulties, this innovative study will allow to efficiently prepare future therapeutic trials, by specifying the phenotype of the patients, and by determining the most relevant outcome measures, taking into account, on one hand, their neurodevelopmental involvement and, on the other hand, the type of experimental design to be used in the context of rare diseases.

Higher amounts of physical activity are linked to multiple health benefits including improved cognition, academic success, and classroom behavior for children. These relationships start in early childhood during the preschool years. Additional research is needed to determine the rates of physical activity among children with autism spectrum disorder. However, research suggests that compared to their typically developing peers, children with autism participate in fewer types of physical activities, often have delays in a range of motor skills, and face physical activity barriers including behavior problems, social communication challenges, and adults' uncertainty about how to modify physically active games to include them. Young children need adult guidance, support, and opportunities to be more active, and early care and education programs are a critical setting for physical activity promotion. Faculty at Northeastern University developed and pilot tested WE PLAY (Wellness Enhancing Physical Activity for Young Children), a teacher training, that is accessed online at no cost. WE PLAY was designed to promote physical activity at the child-level, to promote knowledge, confidence, and skills to lead active play at the teacher-level, and to impact social and environmental challenges at the program-level. Three three pilot studies demonstrated that WE PLAY was efficacious in increasing physical activity when implemented with preschoolers with and without autism and it was viewed as feasible, understandable, and acceptable by early childhood educators. This clinical trial will test the efficacy of WE PLAY in children with autism spectrum disorder and their teachers. The researchers hypothesized that at post-training and follow-up, children in the WE PLAY group will engage in higher levels of physical activity in school relative to children in the control group. Further, the researchers hypothesized that at post-training and follow-up teachers in the WE PLAY group will demonstrate increased behavior intentions, perceived behavior control to perform physical activity facilitating behaviors relative to control group teachers. Additionally, this study will explore the effects of malleable teacher and system-level factors between the intervention and child physical activity. The researchers hypothesized that malleable teacher and system variables including behavior intentions, perceived behavior control, physical activity promotion practices, teachers' perceived physical activity promotion role, teacher autonomy, and supervisor support will mediate or moderate the relationship between study group and child physical activity levels. A national sample of 150 teacher-child dyads from early childhood education programs across the United States will be randomized into two conditions (WE PLAY vs. Control). Data will be collected across three periods over 20 weeks (pre-training = 0 weeks, post-training = 4 weeks, follow-up = 20 weeks). WE PLAY teachers will be asked to complete the WE PLAY training. Control group teachers will complete another online training on a topic that is not related to physical activity. Children with autism (ages 2.9 to 5.11) will wear accelerometers during waking hours for five consecutive days at each of the three data collection periods and their teachers will complete online surveys at each of the three data collection periods. The proposed study addresses a critical need for young children with autism. If WE PLAY is determined to be efficacious on a large scale it would lead to interventions that could be integrated in a variety of settings, including early care and education programs and community settings, which could improve physical activity levels in young children, setting them up for greater success throughout their lives.

Suramin has been found to correct the symptoms, metabolism, and brain synaptic abnormalities in two classical genetic and environmental mouse models of autism. A preliminary clinical trial (SAT-1) examined the safety and activity of a single low-dose of suramin in children with ASD and concluded suramin showed promise as a novel approach to treatment of ASD. The current study, STAT-2A, will be a randomized, double-blind, crossover, 30-week study to evaluate the preliminary proof of concept, safety, and PK of suramin sodium (KZ101) with repeat dosing by IV infusion in males 5-14 years of age who have been diagnosed with ASD. The study will be conducted at approximately 3 sites contributing approximately 15 subjects per site. Total enrollment of approximately 45 subjects is planned to achieve approximately 36 participants completing the study.

This study is evaluating whether a telehealth-based applied behavior analysis (ABA) program can improve the care of adolescents and young adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who are hospitalized because of severe challenging behaviors, such as aggression, self-injury, property destruction, or elopement. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either standard hospital care alone or standard hospital care plus a Telehealth Applied Behavior Analysis for Hospitalized Adolescents and Young Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder (TeleABA) program. The TeleABA program includes assessment by a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), individualized behavior support recommendations, coaching for hospital staff, caregiver training, discharge planning, and four weekly telehealth sessions with caregivers after the participant leaves the hospital. Researchers will compare the two groups to determine whether the TeleABA program improves behavioral outcomes, caregiver confidence and stress, hospital experiences, and the transition from the hospital to home. The findings may help identify more effective ways to support individuals with autism and their families during and after behavioral health hospitalizations.

The purpose of this study is to determine useability and satisfaction characteristics,product usage data,methodological feasibility parameters and feasibility metrics of the mHealth app adapted intervention on the mental health, quality of life, and adaptive functioning of Latino transition aged young adults with ASD and their parents.

The goal of this study is to compare two well-established early autism interventions, Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) and Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT), to better understand which approach is most effective for improving communication skills in young children with autism and which children may benefit most from each treatment. Additionally, after completing either the ESDM or PRT, some participants who meet specific clinical criteria may be offered home-based Developmental Reciprocity Treatment (DRT). The study will include boys and girls 2 to 4 years 11 months old diagnosed with ASD. The main questions this study aims to answer are whether center-based ESDM and center-based PRT improve communication skills in young children with autism, and whether certain children respond better to one treatment approach than the other. Participants will be randomly assigned to either ESDM or PRT for 24 weeks in a center-based program, attend treatment session 4 days per week (\~3 hours/day), complete developmental and autism assessments at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks, have a parent participate in weekly parent training sessions, and complete follow-up assessments at weeks 36 and 48.

The goal of this observational study is to learn if trunk control (the ability to balance and stabilize the upper body while sitting or moving) links autism severity to functional exercise capacity in children aged 4-12 years with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does trunk control explain why children with more severe ASD have lower functional exercise capacity? 2. Do trunk control and functional exercise capacity differ across ASD severity levels (Level 1, 2, and 3)? Participants will complete two assessments in a single 30-40 minute session during their routine clinic visit: 1. A trunk control test, where a trained physiotherapist observes seated balance and movement. 2. A 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), where the child moves along a flat hospital corridor for 6 minutes and the total distance covered is recorded as a measure of functional exercise capacity. No treatment or intervention is involved. All assessments are safe, non-invasive, and conducted at a tertiary care children's hospital in Pakistan.

This clinical research study evaluates the safety and preliminary effects of AdiaVita (umbilical cord blood-derived stem cells and exosomes) combined with glutathione versus glutathione alone in people aged 3 and older with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). In this randomized, participant-blinded crossover trial of about 100 participants, one group receives three monthly AdiaVita IV infusions plus glutathione, while the control group gets placebo saline infusions with the same glutathione regimen; the primary outcome is improvement on Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) scores, with full safety follow-up through 12 months and optional crossover to AdiaVita for eligible controls. The treatment is investigational and not FDA-approved for autism, with no guaranteed benefit and risks including infusion reactions; participants pay $12,000 for the initial schedule, and all data remains confidential.

This observational study aims to evaluate how patterns of behavioral and sensorimotor responses measured using the BlinkLab Dx1 smartphone application relate to autism diagnoses in children ages 2 to 11. BlinkLab Dx1 is a non-invasive, smartphone-based application under development as a diagnostic aid for healthcare providers assessing autism. In this study, children who have undergone a neurodevelopmental assessment within the past 12 months will complete two short, video-based sessions using the BlinkLab Dx1 app. The app presents visual and auditory stimuli and records reflexive sensorimotor responses and patterns of repetitive behavior. Additionally, primary caregivers will answer a short questionnaire in the app about symptoms and development. Information about prior neurodevelopmental assessments, including documented DSM-5-based diagnoses from routine clinical practice, will be collected retrospectively. The study will examine how the app's neurobehavioral measurements relate to previously assigned clinical diagnoses. These paired data will be used to develop and evaluate a machine learning-based algorithm using separate training and testing datasets to assess whether patterns measured by BlinkLab Dx1 can help distinguish children with autism from children without an autism diagnosis. This study does not involve any treatment or medical intervention.

The PUREMIND OS1/OS2 study is a multinational, prospective, longitudinal observational study designed to identify early neurophysiological, biological, environmental, and psychosocial markers associated with neurodevelopmental and mental health conditions from infancy through young adulthood. Observational Study 1 (OS1) follows infants and toddlers at high risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) to discover biomarkers predictive of later clinical diagnosis, using EEG, fNIRS, psychometric assessments, and biological samples. Observational Study 2 (OS2) includes children, adolescents, and young adults with ASD, ADHD, or Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) to identify environmental and biological factors causally linked to anxiety and depression symptoms, and to support the development of personalised criteria for evidence-based interventions. Approximately 800 participants will be recruited across 10 international clinical sites. The study aims to generate multi-domain data to support predictive modelling and inform future personalised mental-health prevention strategies across childhood and young adulthood.

This study aims to develop and evaluate a school-based occupational therapy program focused on sensory processing and activities of daily living for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability. Sensory processing difficulties often affect school participation, behavior regulation, and independence in daily tasks. Although occupational therapy interventions have shown benefits in clinical settings, evidence for their use in schools is limited. The trial will take place at Vali Ayhan Çevik Special Education School and will enroll students aged 6 to 14 years. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will receive weekly 50-minute occupational therapy sessions for 10 to 12 weeks, including sensory preparation, task-oriented practice, and strategies to support everyday skills. The control group will receive family education, a written home program, and routine school observation. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, after the intervention, and at 4 to 6-week follow-up. The main outcome is change in Goal Attainment Scaling scores, which reflect progress toward individualized goals. Additional measures include functional ability, sensory processing, and demographic and clinical information. The study will also monitor feasibility and how closely the program is delivered as planned. This research is expected to provide evidence on the feasibility and effects of a standardized occupational therapy program in a school setting and to support the use of similar approaches in educational contexts.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if WE PLAY for Parents can improve caregivers' knowledge, attitudes, confidence, and skills promoting physical activity with their young child with autism. The main questions it aims to answer are: (1) Do participants who complete WE PLAY for Parents improve their knowledge, behavior intentions, perceived behavior control, self-efficacy, and parenting practices related to physical activity promotion with their child (Primary Hypotheses); and (2) Do participants view WE PLAY for Parents as acceptable, understandable, and feasible \[secondary hypothesis)? Researchers will compare the WE PLAY for Parents group \[experimental arm\] to a Waitlist Control group to see if there are differences in the variables listed in the primary hypothesis. Participants will: (1) Complete a set of questionnaires at three timepoints: pre-training, post-training, and 3-month follow-up that each take between 10-15 minutes; (2) be randomly assigned to take the training over the next two weeks or be offered the training after 3 months. The online training takes about 90 minutes. It includes watching informational videos, viewing video clips of adults helping children be active, reading handouts on behavior management tips and social stories, participating in an anonymous discussion board with other parents, and completing a self-assessment.