Interstitial Lung Diseases

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a comprehensive, multidisciplinary intervention incorporating exercise training, education, and behavior change, shown to improve dyspnea, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in ILD patients. However, access to center-based PR is limited in many settings, including ours, due to geographic, logistical, and socioeconomic barriers. Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HPR) may offer a scalable, accessible alternative with comparable outcomes to conventional PR. The drawback of HPR is the lack of monitoring, which may be overcome by incorporating a telemonitoring program to improve adherence. Data on the effectiveness of HPR in ILD populations-especially in resource-limited settings-are scarce. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the impact of a 6-week home-based PR program on HRQoL and exercise capacity in patients with fibrotic ILD in India. The study hypothesis is that participants undergoing HPR will demonstrate clinically meaningful improvements in disease-specific HRQoL and six-minute walk distance compared to those receiving usual care.

This study is open to adults with fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). People can join the study if they have been diagnosed with this condition within the last 3 years and are at risk of developing progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called nerandomilast helps people with fibrosing interstitial lung disease who may be at risk for their disease getting worse. Participants are put into 2 groups randomly, which means by chance. One group takes nerandomilast tablets, and the other group takes placebo tablets. Placebo tablets look like nerandomilast tablets but do not contain any medicine. Nerandomilast is a type of medicine that may help reduce lung function decline and slow disease progression. Participants are in the study for up to about 2 years and 4 months. During this time, they visit the study site regularly. Doctors regularly test lung function using methods like spirometry to measure forced vital capacity (FVC, maximum amount of air a participant can blow out after taking a deep breath) and DLCO (diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide; it estimates how well oxygen moves from the lungs into the blood). Additionally, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is performed to monitor how the lung condition is changing over time. The results are compared between the groups to see whether the treatment works. The doctors also regularly check participants' health and take note of any unwanted effects.

This study is open to people aged 40 years or older who have at least 1 family member with pulmonary fibrosis. Pulmonary fibrosis is a condition where lung tissue becomes scarred, making it harder to breathe. People can join if a lung scan shows early changes in the lung, called interstitial lung abnormalities, which may lead to lung scarring. People with family members who have pulmonary fibrosis are more likely to develop it themselves. That is why it is important to check early for lung changes and find ways to prevent the condition from getting worse. The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called nerandomilast can help slow down changes in the lung in people with a family history of pulmonary fibrosis. Participants are put into one of 2 groups randomly, which means the group is chosen by chance. One group takes nerandomilast tablets, and the other group takes placebo tablets. Placebo tablets look like nerandomilast tablets but do not contain any medicine. Participants take a tablet twice a day for about 2 to 3 years. There is a 3 out of 5 chance that participants will receive nerandomilast instead of the placebo. Participants are in the study for about 2 to 3 years. Participants visit the study site multiple times: more frequently during the first 2 years (about every 3 months), and then every 6 months thereafter. In the 3rd year, participants also have phone calls with the site staff every 3 months. Doctors regularly test lung function and take chest scans to see if the treatment works. The results are compared between the 2 groups to see if nerandomilast helps. The doctors also check participants' health and take note of any unwanted effects.

The CT-IPF ANTHEM study is designed to prospectively compare PCDCT to HRCT scan in the identification of specific ILD diagnosis discussed during the multidisciplinary discussion to increase diagnostic confidence and reduce unclassifiable ILD cases.

RESET-SSc: A Phase 1/2 Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CABA-201, a CD19-CAR T cell therapy, in Subjects with Systemic Sclerosis

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether adding the JAK inhibitor golidocitinib to standard corticosteroid therapy works to treat rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) in patients with acute worsening. It will also learn about its safety compared to standard treatment without JAK inhibitors (i.e., corticosteroids plus other immunosuppressants such as mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, cyclophosphamide, or biologics). The main questions it aims to answer are: * How much does the addition of golidocitinib improve lung function, measured by the absolute change in FVC (mL), after 12 weeks of treatment? * How does it compare to standard therapy in terms of changes in FVC% predicted, oxygenation index, chest CT score, need for invasive respiratory support, all-cause mortality, relapse rate, and incidence of opportunistic infections? Researchers will compare the golidocitinib group (golidocitinib 150 mg once daily plus corticosteroids) to the control group (corticosteroids plus non-JAK inhibitor immunosuppressants). All patients receive high-dose corticosteroids (prednisone equivalent ≥1 mg/kg/day) with a tapering regimen. Participants will: * Receive either golidocitinib plus corticosteroids or control treatment for 12 weeks * Visit the clinic for check-ups, blood tests, and lung function tests at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6-8, and 12 * Have chest high-resolution CT scans at weeks 2, 4-6, and 12 to monitor disease progression * Be monitored for adverse events and efficacy outcomes throughout the 12-week period

We propose to acquire data and blood samples on all patients being cared for by the Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) program. Additionally, we will collect data and blood samples from a control group for comparator purposes. In doing so, we will be able to describe the "phenotypic" expression of these diseases.

The use of lung ultrasound is instrumental in the evaluation of many chest pathologies and its ability to detect pleuro-pulmonary pathology is widely accepted. However, the use of ultrasound to explore the state of the peripheral lung parenchyma, when the organ is still aerated, is a relatively new application. Horizontal and vertical artifacts are separate and distinct artifacts that can be seen during ultrasound examination of the lungs. While the practical role of lung ultrasound artifacts is accepted to detect and monitor many conditions, further research is needed for the physical interpretation of ultrasound artifacts. These artifacts are diagnostic signs, but we don't fully understand their origin. The artifactual information deriving from the surface acoustic interaction, beyond the pleural line, in the ultrasound images of the normally aerated and non-deflated lung, represents the final result of complex interactions of acoustic waves with a specific three-dimensional structure of the biological tissue. Thus, the umbrella term "vertical artifacts" oversimplifies many physical phenomena associated with a pathological pleural plane. There is growing evidence that vertical artifacts are caused by physiological and pathological changes in the superficial lung parenchyma. Therefore, the need emerges to explore the physical phenomena underlying the artifactual ultrasound information deriving from the surface acoustic interaction of ultrasound with the pleuro-pulmonary structures.

The concerned patients are children and adults suffering from idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, other chronic fibrosing interstitial pneumonias with a progressive phenotype, and interstitial pneumonia associated with Scleroderma and related cases of patients carrying a mutation on one of the telomere-associated genes. This is a national, observational, longitudinal, multicenter study that will be conducted retrospectively and prospectively. It aims to collect consistent and comparable clinical data for patients and their relatives, whether they carry a mutation or not, affected by diffuse idiopathic interstitial pneumopathy. The expected duration of the study, including data analysis, is approximately 10 years (5 years for participant enrollment and 5 years of follow-up, in addition to the steps for data management and statistical analyses). Each participating center will inform every participant by providing an information sheet, and their written consent will be obtained before including them in the study and commencing data collection. Prospective medical data will be collected at 6 months to 1 year after enrollment and then at least once per year for patients up to 5 years and 5 years for their relatives. Participants will complete a self-questionnaire during their regular follow-up consultations or by accessing a secure interface.

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are common chronic disease characterized by high mortality and morbidity, also linked to cardiovascular implication. Cardiovascular complications, occur early in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other ILDs without anysymptoms. Symptoms are often misinterpreted and diagnosis delayed to irreversible stages of cardiac dysfunction. Mechanism of cardiac damage, the main cause of mortality, are heterogeneous raging from ischemic heart disease, acceleration of atherosclerosis, to right ventricle dysfunction secondary, to pulmonary hypertension. So an early recognition and accurate staging are fundamental to avoid disease progression and improve outcomes. The identification of a single non-invasive imaging modality able to simultaneously characterize in an accurate and quantitative way the entity of lung and cardiac damage in patients affected by ILD would be useful to improve risk stratification and to guide treatment.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) represents a various group of disorders characterized by inflammation and fibrosis within the lung parenchyma.\[1\] ILD refers to a group of diffuse parenchymal lung disorders, including a spectrum of conditions such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), sarcoidosis, and connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of the interstitium. ILD results in Impaired lung function and, in severe cases, respiratory failure.\[1\] Diagnosing ILD is a complex task due to the heterogeneous nature of these disorders. Distinguishing between different ILD subtypes and identifying disease progression present ongoing challenges in clinical practice. .\[2\] BAL emerges as a key investigative tool , allowing for the collection of bronchoalveolar fluid. The cellular and molecular composition of BAL fluid provides valuable insights into the underlying pathology, aiding in the differential diagnosis of ILD subtypes. The gold standard in BAL analysis is cytological examination by microscopy.\[3\] Flow cytometry is an updated method of BAL analysis which can provide quicker and more objective results and, with the appropriate design of antibody panels, accurately quantify the main leukocyte subsets. Several studies have described the usefulness of flowcytometry for the discrimination of sarcoidosis from other lymphocytic pathologies or even to perform leukocyte subset counting in diverse ILDs.\[4\]\[5\] Both microscopic and flowcytometric examination of BAL in ILD are complementary tools that provide comprehensive information about the cellular landscape of the lower respiratory tract ,conclusive for: Accurate diagnosis Primary aim: Characterization of specific inflammatory cellular infiltrate in different interstitial lung diseases. \- Secondary aims: 1. Correlation between clinical ,radiological and inflammatory cellular pattern as regards BAL findings of different interstitial lung diseases 2. Assessment of impact on outcome, prognosis and survival of the disease as regards management modification after BAL characterization

This is Prospective observational study to analyze the clinical features, risk factors, outcome,mortality rates in interstitial lung diseases patients who required admission in Respiratory ICU

This study aims to i) To characterize the functional status and explore the determinants of functional status decline of people with IlD ii)To determine the measurement properties of functional status instruments in people with Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) iii) To identify the impact of ILD and the participants' perspectives on functional status through interviews iv) Explore the progression of functional status progression in people with ILD and v) Develop a multidimensional index, incorporating functional status parameters, to predict mortality in people with ILD. Patients with ILD will be recruited via the pulmonology services at hospitals, namely from Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho (CHVNG/E), Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga (CHBV) and Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga (CHEDV). Sociodemographic, clinical characteristics (i.e., smoking habits, vital signs and symptoms), anthropometric (i.e., height and weight to compute body mass index) and general clinical data (i.e., medication, oxygen therapy, non-invasive ventilation, acute exacerbations, hospitalizations and number of hospital admissions in the last month and year, length of stay), as well as prior and follow-up spirometric measurements and arterial blood gas will be collected from clinical records for patients' characterization. Mortality and rehospitalizations will be explored during the study period. Peripheral muscle strength, functional status, daily physical activity, self-reported symptoms, functional status, impact of the disease and health-related quality of life. Qualitative data from interviews. The assessments will be conducted at 6 time points: baseline and 1 week after for instrument validation, followed by assessments every 6 months for 2 years. It is expected that: i) Functional status limitations can be comprehensively identified and measured in individuals with ILD. ii) Some measures are valid and reliable indicators of functional status in individuals with ILD. iii) Different profiles of functional status progression will be identified in individuals with ILD, including stable, slow, and fast decline. iv) A multidimensional index incorporating functional status will improve the accuracy of predicting mortality and outperform the predictive ability of the current GAP Index.