Knee Arthroplasty, Total

Prospective Cohort of patients who are scheduled for a Robot Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (RATKA). A prospective survey of patient reported outcome measures (Numeric Rating Scale) will be obtained postoperatively of 72 hours, as well as at the postoperative opioid consumption after 72 hours.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect, cost-effectiveness, safety and satisfaction with replacing standardized, pre-scheduled face-to-face visits with remote monitoring and video consultations or face-to-face consultations only when needed after knee replacement surgery due to knee osteoarthritis. The primary outcome is the probability of being a OMERACT-OARSI responder at 6 months post-surgery. This is a composite index where participants are classified as a responder or non-responder based on improvement in pain, function and/or disease activity. Health-related quality of life and healthcare costs will be used to determine cost-effectiveness. Patient-reported adverse events and statisfaction will be used to determine safety and satisfaction. Patients will be recruited from Diakonhjemmet Hospital. Patients undergoing knee replacement surgery will be randomly allocated to a control group who are summoned for a face-to-face consultation at Diakonhjemmet Hospital at 2 and 12 months, or a remote monitoring group who will not be scheduled for hospital visits but will answer patient-reported outcomes throught a web-application at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery and only be scheduled for hospital visits when needed. An additional study with follow-up after 5 and 10 years will be conducted.

To evaluate the effectiveness of Adductor Canal Block and combined Adductor Canal plus IPACK block in reducing postoperative pain and analgesic requirements in patients undergoing knee surgery.

This project evaluates a new weight-bearing CT method to later improve early detection of implant migration after knee arthroplasty. This method aims to allow patients to apply a controlled load during CT scanning, simulating standing conditions with real-time feedback. The study has two phases. First, in healthy volunteers, biomechanical loading during prone simulated weight-bearing will be compared with a standard standing squat to validate the method. Second, in arthroplasty patients, standard radiographs will be compared with loaded and unloaded WBCT scans. Patients will not deviate from the standard plan of care. The CT images are additions to the standard RX images and are not intended for diagnostic purposes to the patient. The aim is to determine whether this method opens the door for more accurate and earlier detection of implant migration than current clinical imaging in the future, potentially improving long-term outcomes after knee arthroplasty.

The purpose of this research study is to compare two different combinations of anesthetic medications to see which works the best in providing the longest lasting pain relief for total knee arthroplasty surgery. The drugs being used are liposomal bupivacaine compared to a combination of bupivacaine, clonidine, epinephrine, buprenorphine, and dexamethasone. Pain scores will be collected at different intervals during study participation.

Despite high success rates of hip and knee arthroplasty, up to 20% of patients report moderate-to-severe pain (NRS \> 3) persisting beyond the expected healing period. This investigator-initiated, descriptive cohort study will re-invite approximately 100 consenting patients with persistent postoperative pain-identified from a pool of \~7 000 respondents-to complete standardized assessments of neuropathic (DN4), nociplastic (IASP criteria + Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire) and nociceptive (KOOS/HOOS pain domains) pain. Primary outcomes are the prevalence of potential nociplastic pain and the proportion experiencing significant pain in two or more mechanistic categories. Secondary analyses will compare baseline vs. re-evaluated DN4 scores, FSQ and KOOS/HOOS distributions, and examine differences between patients with and without possible neuropathic pain. Findings will inform targeted pre- and postoperative pain management strategies.

To stay strong, patients should do some strength training at least twice a week. However arthritic pain can limit walking and activity. The wait for knee surgery can be long, which can lead to loss of muscle strength. Patients who need a new knee joint tend to be older. If older people do not exercise and become weak, they tire easily, and may take longer to recover after surgery. Patients recover faster after having a new knee joint if their leg muscles are strong. This is why exercise before surgery can help people to make the most of their new joint. Patients come to a joint school where the investigators show them exercises and advise how to get ready for surgery. Patients are given a sheet of pictures and prompts for each exercise but the investigators know that some people don't do the exercises that they are given. Exercises are more likely to be done if they are fun, if people can see they make a difference, if they know what to do, and if their physiotherapist can check what they are doing.

Studies have been made on the best way to do knee surgery and whether to conserve the posterior cruciate ligament or not during total knee prosthesis insertion is still under debate. However, most of these studies were made before the introduction of robotic knee surgery. It seems timely to do a study comparing these two surgical techniques: preservation versus removal of the posterior cruciate ligament in knee arthroplasty

Approximately 20-30% of patients experience persistent pain after a Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). This study investigates whether percutaneous cryoneurolysis of genicular nerves can reduce pain and improve physical function when performed at least 24 hours before surgery. Participants will be randomized to receive either the cryoneurolysis procedure + TKA or TKA only. Results will be tracked for 6 months to see if the intervention improves long-term recovery and quality of life.

The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic outcomes (time to first analgesic request, total amount of analgesic consumption, and pain scores) following total knee arthroplasty by either combined biceps femoris short head block and adductor canal block or genicular nerve block in elderly patients.

The aim is to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of Adductor Canal and Biceps Femoris Short Head Blocks with Adductor Canal Block in patients undergoing Knee Arthroplasty surgery

After undergoing total hip or total knee arthroplasty, current guidelines recommend routine follow-up with an X-ray within 3 months and again at 1 year. Follow-up at 5 years (for hip arthroplasties) or every 5 years (for knee arthroplasties) is also considered worthwhile according to the guideline. However, these follow-up appointments require considerable time from patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals, and it is unclear whether they are truly beneficial. It is possible that a single follow-up within 3 months is sufficient. This could potentially prevent over 100,000 unnecessary hospital visits per year, resulting in significant cost savings. If patients or healthcare providers have concerns, they can always request an additional follow-up. The HAKA trial consists of three different work packages (WPs). This trial (WP1) investigates the 1-year follow-up, WP2 examines the 10-year follow-up, and WP3 is a qualitative study exploring the experiences and perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals. The aim of the HAKA trial is to safely reduce routine follow-up appointments after total hip or knee arthroplasty and to revise current clinical guidelines accordingly.

The study involves the enrollment of a sample of patients with indication for total knee replacement surgery in order to compare the conventional surgical technique currently used in the reference departments with the surgical technique with the aid of computer-assisted navigation. The comparison between the two techniques will be performed in terms of clinical-functional results, perioperative bleeding and healthcare costs (surgical time, hospital stay). The research protocol involves the participation of 160 total patients divided into two groups, of 80 patients each, by type of surgical technique.

The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of administering low-dose epinephrine and tranexamic acid on perioperative blood loss, thromboembolic complications, and hospitalization duration in patients undergoing knee joint arthroplasty. Also aim to evaluate the effect of administering low-dose epinephrine and tranexamic acid on perioperative thromboembolic complications, and hospitalization duration

After undergoing total hip or total knee arthroplasty, current guidelines recommend routine follow-up with an X-ray within 3 months and again at 1 year. Follow-up at 5 years (for hip arthroplasties) or every 5 years (for knee arthroplasties) is also considered worthwhile according to the guideline. However, these follow-up appointments require considerable time from patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals, and it is unclear whether they are truly beneficial. It is possible that a single follow-up within 3 months is sufficient. This could potentially prevent over 100,000 unnecessary hospital visits per year, resulting in significant cost savings. If patients or healthcare providers have concerns, they can always request an additional follow-up. The HAKA trial consists of three different work packages (WPs). This trial (WP2) investigates the 10-year follow-up, WP1 examines the 1-year follow-up, and WP3 is a qualitative study exploring the experiences and perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals. The aim of the HAKA trial is to safely reduce routine follow-up appointments after total hip or knee arthroplasty and to revise current clinical guidelines accordingly.

After undergoing total hip or total knee arthroplasty, current guidelines recommend routine follow-up with an X-ray within 3 months and again at 1 year. Follow-up at 5 years (for hip arthroplasties) or every 5 years (for knee arthroplasties) is also considered worthwhile according to the guidelines. However, these follow-up appointments require considerable time from patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals, and it is unclear whether they are truly beneficial. It is possible that a single follow-up within 3 months is sufficient. This could potentially prevent over 100,000 unnecessary hospital visits per year, resulting in significant cost savings. If patients or healthcare providers have concerns, they can always request an additional follow-up. The HAKA trial consists of three different work packages (WPs).The quantitative work packages 1 (WP1) and 2 (WP2) will investigate the 1-year and 10-year follow-up. The qualitative third work package (WP3) will explore and compare the patients' and health care professionals' (HCPs) experiences with, and perceptions about, RFU and COD after total hip and knee arthroplasty. The aim of the overarching HAKA-trial is to safely reduce routine follow-up appointments after total hip or knee arthroplasty and to revise current clinical guidelines accordingly.

Patients may have fears about moving after TKA surgery. This fear has been described in the literature. Fear of re-injury has also been called kinesiophobia, which is the primary psychosocial structure in the fear-avoidance model. Injury or surgery can create feelings of uncertainty and fear of how much the injury will affect future function. This situation causes the individual to have negative attitudes towards activity. For this reason, kinesiophobia is a psychological element that can affect patient outcomes and recovery after knee trauma or knee surgery. Kinesiophobia is considered a normal reaction in the early postoperative period. However, it can affect patients' early mobility after TKA. It is important to improve functional outcomes in the early period, especially in knee surgeries. Patients may delay mobilization because they feel a fear of falling after surgery, and as this delay increases, their mobility is affected worse. The only solution to this situation, which can enter a vicious circle, is to determine patients' fear of falling and apply interventions accordingly. There are studies in the literature evaluating the fear of movement after total knee arthroplasty and its effect on patients' mobility levels. However, no study has been found investigating the effect of a motivational speech prepared with the help of artificial intelligence on patients. The World Health Organization (WHO) has published a four-year global strategy report on digital health within the scope of the vision of health everywhere and for everyone. According to this report, digital health is defined as "the adoption of digital technologies to improve and develop health". The use of artificial intelligence technology is increasing day by day in the changing and developing world. It is known that nurses constitute 45% of all health professionals in the field of health and that insufficient staff number continues to be a priority problem. It is expected that insufficient staff will be supported and efficiency will increase with the contribution of artificial intelligence, which is the copy of human intelligence with advanced technology. With this research, we aim to both support staff and improve patient outcomes by using artificial intelligence technologies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of an artificial intelligence-supported motivational speech on patients' fear of movement and mobility level after knee replacement.

The purpose of this prospective study is to explore whether maximal and self-selected walking speed in individuals with knee arthroplasty is a useful and applicable clinical measure that can provide new insights into physical function after prosthetic surgery. We will examine the progression of walking speed and other measures of physical function, and investigate if walking speed can predict postoperative function. Individuals over 55 years, scheduled for knee arthroplasty will be invited to participate. Standardized functional tests such as walking speed, sit to stand and one legged stance along with patient reported outcomes will be assessed preoperatively, three months and 12 months after surgery. The study may provide useful knowledge that can be aplied clinically in the assessment and follow-up of this patient group.

The goal of this study is to compare the anesthetic combination iPACK with femoral triangle block versus surgical LIA for unilateral TKA. We hypothesize that an iPACK block with femoral triangle block is non-inferior to surgical LIA. Furthermore, due to visualization of the relevant neural and vascular structures, the risk of accidental popliteal block, nerve damage or LAST with (a blindly performed) LIA could theoretically be reduced.

The goal of the clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of the AtMoves Knee System in the clinical diagnostic process of aseptic loosening in patients with a knee prosthesis. The main question it aims to answer is: Does the use of the AtMoves Knee System reduce the percentage of failed outcomes? A "failed outcome" is defined as a change in the patient-reported Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-PS) that is lower than the minimal clinically important difference at 12 months. Researchers will compare two groups: The first group will undergo an additional CT scan using the AtMoves Knee System. The second group will not undergo these scans. Both groups are allowed to undergo additional diagnostic measures. Researchers will compare the percentage of "failed outcomes" between these groups. During the one-year follow-up, participants in both groups will be asked to fill out questionnaires.

This prospective clinical study aims at evaluating clinical, radiographic, patient-reported outcomes of total knee arthroplasty with Physica TT Tibial Plate over 2 years after surgery, in order to assess the performance and safety of the devices. Short-term survivorship of the implant and the incidence of early complications are evaluated.

Following total knee arthroplasty, patients may encounter numerous problems that can hinder the performance of daily living activities, negatively impact quality of life, and increase morbidity and mortality rates. In this context, this study was designed to evaluate the effect of nursing education and tele-consultation, based on Watson's Theory of Human Caring, on daily living activities, self-care agency, and quality of life in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

A Post-Market Domestic (US) and International Data Collection to Assess the Truliant® Knee System

The purpose of this study is to evaluate both clinical measures and PROMs in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using restricted inverse kinematic alignment (iKA) compared to mechanical alignment (MA), both using surgical navigation assistance.

Rationale for conducting the study: The study aims to systematically evaluate the clinical and economic impacts of Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Replacement (RTKR) compared to conventional Total Knee Replacement (TKR). It focuses on the potential benefits of RTKR, including improved precision in surgery, potentially leading to better patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. Our primary endpoint is the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), aimed at measuring patients awareness of their knee joint in everyday life, indicating the success of the knee replacement surgery in restoring natural joint function. Secondary endpoints include patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), patient activity levels, the accuracy of implant positioning on x-ray, and the incidence of adverse events. Study design: Multicentre,, preference-tolerant, randomized, controlled, superiority trial with two treatment arms that compares the outcomes of RTKR with traditional TKR techniques. Study population: Adult patients aged 18 years and older who are eligible for TKR as per local guidelines and who have given informed consent to participate in the study. Number of patients: 400 Inclusion criteria: Patients must be adults aged 18 years and older, eligible for TKR according to local guidelines, and willing to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria: Patients with extreme malalignment requiring special implants or techniques, patients unfit for surgery due to medical reasons, and those deemed unsuitable to participate in the study for other reasons. Primary outcome variables: The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) at 2 years after surgery