Proton Therapy

Researchers are doing this study to better understand how certain treatment planning and clinical workflow software systems support the delivery of standard-of-care proton radiation therapy. The main question it aims to answer is how well the software works in the workflow. Participants will receive proton therapy.

This study is being done to evaluate whether cancer patients can safely and reliably receive proton radiation therapy while positioned upright. Proton therapy is an established form of radiation treatment, and the upright treatment system used in this study has been cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The intent of this protocol is to observe the treatment methods, doses, and outcomes for the initial cohorts of patients treated with this upright device. This study will support research activities and evaluate feasibility as needed. Results of this study will be reported in the scientific literature but the investigators do not intend to report to the FDA for a new use or indication or change to the labeling; nor are the investigators required to do so.

For a young patient, the conditions of proton therapy treatment can be stressful. Adjusting the environment can be a source of avoiding this physical and psychological discomfort impacting the quality of treatment. A fixed, long, uncomfortable position is the main cause of stress, already present due to the cancerous therapeutic course. It extends the positioning time. For the patient and the optimization of his treatment, solutions must be sought. Relaxation in virtual reality is efficient, simple and non-medicinal and could reduce stress in children and allow irradiation in very good conditions. We will assess the effectiveness of the virtual reality session using objective (placement time, helmet tolerance) and subjective (perceived anxiety via a dedicated questionnaire) criteria. This is the first pediatric virtual reality study, supported by the French Group of Pediatric Radiotherapists, to reduce anxiety in radiotherapy. Multiple benefits from this pilot study are expected, such as improved reception conditions, treatment parameters and better acceptance of proton therapy sessions.

This is an open-label, single-center, non-randomized phase I/II pilot study evaluating proton-based Total Marrow Irradiation (TMI) as part of the conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in adult patients with high-risk or relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). These patients have an unfavorable prognosis with standard conditioning approaches. Participants will receive a standard conditioning regimen consisting of either myeloablative or reduced-intensity chemotherapy, selected according to age and comorbidities, combined with proton TMI delivered at a total dose of 12 Gy in three fractions. Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis will be administered according to institutional standards, preferentially using post-transplant cyclophosphamide. Patients will subsequently undergo standard allo-HSCT and will be followed for at least 24 months after transplantation. The primary objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of proton TMI added to standard conditioning, as measured by non-relapse mortality and treatment-related toxicity within the first 100 days after transplantation. Secondary objectives include evaluation of engraftment kinetics, incidence of relapse, overall and relapse-free survival, GvHD outcomes, and quality of life. Study outcomes will be analyzed descriptively and compared with a matched historical cohort.

This is an interventional, single arm, open-label, feasibility trial with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, followed by concomitant proton therapy and capecitabine, followed by re-evaluation and surgery (when feasible) for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Proton therapy is a cancer treatment, similar to the more commonly used radiation therapy. It uses radiation to destroy cancer cells and helps control the disease in the treated area. However, when proton therapy is compared with standard radiation therapy, many studies show fewer side effects and better disease control. This is due to the unique physical properties of the particles used in proton therapy. At present, in Italy, this innovative treatment is available only for selected diseases, as defined by national guidelines. For this reason, it is very important to collect as much data as possible to support the further development of proton therapy and to improve treatment safety and effectiveness.

Cavernous sinus meningiomas are close to optic nerve, pituitary gland, cranial nerve, and hippocampi. The doses delivered to these structures are crucial and radiotherapy of cavernous sinus meningiomas exposes patients to late secondary effects (pituitary deficit, nerve palsy, cognitive impairment…). In 2012, Gondi reported that a dose given to 40% of the bilateral hippocampi greater than 7.3 Gy is associated with long-term impairment in list-learning delayed recall after FSRT for benign or low-grade adult brain tumors. There is no published or recruiting prospective study evaluating the impact of proton-therapy or conventional irradiation on neurocognitive function for meningioma patients. Notably, long-term cognitive or ocular impact of these modern irradiation schemes remains poorly known. Yet, these patients had a long life-expectancy, and are at risk of developing long-term sequelae. Thus, according to its ballistic advantage, an improvement of patient functional outcomes and a reduction of neurocognitive long-term toxicity are expected if tissue sparing proton-therapy is used. In this context, a randomized prospective study, evaluating long-term toxicity of these two irradiation modalities (Proton Therapy (PRT) and photon radiotherapy (XRT)) seems crucial to further assess proton-therapy indication for these patients. Although literature reports excellent outcomes for intracranial meningioma patients treated by proton-therapy, none of the eight retrospective studies found in the literature used an accurate and full evaluation of long-term toxicity

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole-breast irradiation (WBI) remains the standard therapeutic approach for early-stage breast cancer. Long-term follow-up data from the FAST trial (10-year analysis) demonstrated that the 28.5 Gy/5-fraction regimen exhibited comparable adverse effects to the conventional 50 Gy/25-fraction regimen, with no statistically significant differences in photographic cosmetic assessments at 2 and 5 years post-treatment. The FAST-Forward trial demonstrated comparable 5-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rates (IBTR) and incidence of radiation-related toxicities between ultra-hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (UH-WBI; 26 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week) and moderately hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (MH-WBI; 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks). Additionally, no statistically significant difference in cosmetic outcomes was observed between the two regimens at the 2-year follow-up. Proton radiotherapy enables precise dose delivery to tumor targets while minimizing radiation exposure to surrounding normal tissues, thereby reducing treatment-related toxicities. However, current clinical protocols predominantly employ conventional fractionation for proton therapy, with a paucity of robust evidence evaluating the efficacy and safety of ultra-hypofractionated proton radiotherapy in breast cancer patients. This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to establish high-level scientific evidence for the clinical application of ultra-hypofractionated proton radiotherapy following BCS, ensuring non-inferiority in oncologic control, toxicity profiles, and cosmetic preservation compared to standard regimens.

The purpose of this trial is to compare the toxicities and efficacy of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for breast cancer patients indicated for radiotherapy including preoperative radiotherapy, postoperative radiotherapy, or definitive radiotherapy. IMPT or IMRT will be administered to the whole breast, chest wall, and/or regional lymph nodes. A boost dose will be delivered in patients with high-risk area, at the discretion of the radiation oncologist. Eligible breast cancer patients will be followed for at least 5 years to assess acute and late radiation induced toxicities, loco-regional recurrence, overall survival, distant metastasis, and quality of life.

The PROTECT trial will test the hypothesis that proton (PT) -enabled radiation dose reductions to sensitive, normal tissues will result in lower rates of treatment-related pulmonary complications in esophageal cancer compared to standard photon therapy (XT).

The purpose of this protocol is to determine toxicity and efficacy of proton therapy in combination with standard concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy and standard image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). The over-all aim is to maintain a high disease control and at the same time reduce acute morbidity as well as late side effects after treatment.

Rationale: Chordomas and chondrosarcomas located in the axial skeleton are malignant neoplasms of bone. These tumors share the same clinical challenges, as the effect of the disease is more a function of their local aggressiveness than their tendency to metastasize (20% metastasize). The local aggressive behavior can cause debilitating morbidity and mortality by destruction of nearby located critical neurovascular structures. Imaging has, in addition to histopathology, a role in diagnosis and in guiding (neo)adjuvant and definitive treatment. Despite the low sensitivity to radiotherapy, proton radiotherapy has been successfully used as an adjunct to resection or as definitive treatment for aggressive chordomas and chondrosarcomas, making it a standard indication for proton therapy in the Netherlands. Chordomas and chondrosarcomas consist, especially after previous therapy, of non-viable and viable tumor components. Identification of these viable components by functional imaging is important to determine the effect of previous therapy, as change in total tumor volume occurs more than 200 days after change of functional imaging parameters. Objective: The main objective of this study is to determine if functional MRI parameters change within 6 months, and earlier than volumetric changes after start of proton beam therapy. This would allow timely differentiation between affected and unaffected (viable) tumor components, which can be used for therapy adjustment. Secondary objectives: Determine which set of parameters (PET-CT and secondary MRI) can predict clinical outcome (tumor specific mortality, development of metastases, morbidity secondary to tumor activity and morbidity secondary to treatment); determine what type of imaging can accurately identify viable tumor nodules relative to critical anatomical structures; improving understanding of relevance of changing imaging parameters by correlating these with resected tumor. Study design: Prospective cohort study Study population: LUMC patients diagnosed with primary or recurrent chordoma or chondrosarcoma in the axial skeleton. A number of 20 new patients per year is expected. Main study parameters: Volumetric and functional MR imaging parameters including permeability parameters. Secondary parameters are generated by PET-CT (SUV, MTV and TLG), MR (perfusion, permeability and diffusion), therapy (proton beam dose mapping, surgery) and clinical outcome. End points are disease specific survival, progression free survival (including development of metastases), side effects of treatment, and functional outcome (see CRF). In patients who are treated with surgical resection following neo-adjuvant therapy, the surgical specimen will be correlated with imaging findings. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Treatment and clinical management will not be affected in this study, thus the additional burden, risks, and benefits associated with participation in this study are minimal. Two extra MRI and one PET-CT examination will be planned during proton therapy.