Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA

This is an international, multicentre, feasibility mixed-methods, single-arm study evaluating the implementation of the iPROLEPSIS digital health promotion programme for adults with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in real-world clinical practice. The study will enrol 72 adults with PsA (18 participants per country) across Portugal, the Netherlands, Greece, and the United Kingdom. Participants will be followed for 12 months, including a 1-month baseline monitoring period without intervention, followed by an 11-month intervention period during which participants will use the iPROLEPSIS digital health ecosystem. The iPROLEPSIS ecosystem integrates multiple digital health tools designed to support lifestyle management, self-monitoring, and patient engagement in PsA care. Participants will use the miPROLEPSIS app for active and passive data collection and personalised lifestyle recommendations related to diet and physical activity; biAURA for sleep and stress management using binaural beats; iPROLEPSIS Games to promote physical and emotional well-beingthrough serious games; and the miPROLEPSIS Joint Landmarker app for video-based functional assessments. The ecosystem will also integrate data from a Garmin vívoactive 5 smartwatch and wireless earbuds. Healthcare professionals involved in participant follow-up will access a dedicated clinical dashboard to support monitoring and clinical management. The primary objective of this feasibility study is to evaluate the usability of the iPROLEPSIS digital health ecosystem among patients with PsA and healthcare professionals using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the eHealth UsaBility Benchmarking Instrument (HUBBI). Secondary objectives include assessing participant retention, acceptability of study participation, engagement with the digital health tools, adherence to study procedures, and identifying barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of the digital health programme in routine clinical practice.The study will also generate preliminary evidence regarding potential changes in clinical and patient-reported outcomes associated with the use of the iPROLEPSIS ecosystem and include a preliminary budget impact analysis to inform the design of a future larger-scale clinical trial.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory condition that affects the joints but can also have an effect on multiple parts of the body. This study will assess if the effectiveness of Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) medications used to treat type 2-diabetes and weight management, or nutrition counseling can better treat individuals with Psoriatic Arthritis who are also needing treatment for obesity and type 2 diabetes. The main objectives it aims to answer are: To assess disease outcomes of PsA patients undergoing treatment for concomitant obesity and type 2 diabetes with GLP-1 analogs vs nutrition counseling. To assess effectiveness as measured by clinical and patient reported outcome measures in patients treated with GLP-1 and nutrition counseling. Participants will be randomized to receive a GLP-1 or nutrition counseling. Participants will be asked to come to the study center at most four times during a 24-week period. During this time participants will be asked to fill out questionnaires, receive a physical exam, and have their blood drawn.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of antiplatelet therapy on the endovascular phenotype in psoriasis, specifically whether clopidogrel reduces vascular endothelial pro-atherosclerotic transcript expression more than aspirin or placebo. The primary endpoint is mean change in a composite endothelial pro-inflammatory/pro-atherosclerotic transcript expression signature measured from brachial vein endothelial cells.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the live attenuated tetravalent Butantan-Dengue vaccine (Butantan-DV) is safe and capable of inducing an immune response in patients aged 12 to 59 years with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) who are clinically stable and under low-grade or no immunosuppression, as well as in healthy volunteers matched by sex and age. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the vaccine induce adequate seroconversion in patients with ARDs compared to healthy controls? What is the frequency and intensity of common adverse events after vaccination in ARDs patients? Does physical activity levels and nutritional status influence vaccine-induced immune response in patients with ARDs? Researchers will compare patients with ARDs to healthy controls to evaluate if the vaccine elicits similar immune responses and safety profiles. All participants will: * receive a single 0.5 mL dose of the Butantan-DV vaccine via subcutaneous injection; * undergo blood sample collection before and after vaccination (baseline, Day 42, and Day 400) to assess antibody and cellular responses; * attend follow-up visits on Days 7, 14, and 42 for safety monitoring and laboratory tests; * report any symptoms or adverse events using a standardized diary for 42 days; * be followed for up to one year for long-term safety and immunogenicity assessments. * wear a device for 14 consecutive days to assess current and habitual physical activity levels. * answer three non-consecutive 24-hour dietary recalls, including at least one weekend day to assess nutritional status. * collect blood samples one-year after vaccination to access immunogenicity and cellular response. Researcher will also perform subgroups analysis in: A viremia subgroup (50 patients and 50 healthy controls) will provide additional samples on Days 1, 7, 14, 28, 42, and-if viremia is detected-Day 68, to evaluate post-vaccination viremia and its duration. An immunogenicity subgroup (\~20% of participants, n=96) will undergo cellular immune response testing via flow cytometry to evaluate T-cell responses.

This is a multi-center, open-label Ph 1b basket study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, biomarker response, and preliminary efficacy of multiple doses of S-4321 in adults with autoimmune or immune-mediated disease including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (PsO), cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) with or without systemic manifestations, or atopic dermatitis (AD).

PREVENER is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase IV clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a carotid ultrasound-based strategy for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD). Patients with IRD, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), have a 50% higher risk of cardiovascular (CV) events compared to the general population. However, conventional CV risk scores (SCORE2/OP) systematically underestimate this risk, leaving many high-risk patients without appropriate preventive treatment. Patients aged ≥50 years with IRD and low-to-moderate CV risk according to SCORE2/OP will be randomized 1:1 to either an experimental group (carotid ultrasound to detect subclinical atherosclerosis) or a control group (standard care according to ESC 2021 guidelines). Patients in the experimental group with carotid plaques will be reclassified as very high CV risk and treated with high-intensity statins (LDL target \<55 mg/dL). The primary endpoint is the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) over 48 months of follow-up.

This is a trial to find out how weight loss (achieved by the use of tirzepatide) or ixekizumab treatment affects the characteristics of skin, joint and fat tissues in patients with Psoriatic Arthritis, Psoriasis and obesity/overweight BMI \>=27. Participants will be allocated either Tirzepatide, Ixekizumab or both. Samples of joint tissue, fat and skin will be taken at the start of the study and week 12. Blood and urine samples will also be taken. The primary objective will be to assess the changes seen in the joint, fat and skin tissue samples 12 weeks after starting the medications (additional analysis will be done on the optional 36 week samples). Secondary objectives will be * To assess the changes seen in blood 4, 12, 36 and 52 weeks after starting the medication. * To compare the changes seen in tissue and blood between Ixekizumab and Tirzepatide/Weight loss. * To see how the changes seen in the tissue relate to weight loss.

Rheumatic diseases constitute a group of non-communicable diseases characterized by chronic inflammation. The most common autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) are rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, myositis, Sjogren's syndrome and systemic scleroderma. These autoimmune disorders lead to joint destruction and adversely influence the human body systemically. One of their characteristics is comorbidity, since patients usually suffer also from other pathologies such as cardiovascular diseases and obesity. In addition, their treatment requires a combination of both biological and conventional pharmaceutical interventions as well as other parameters such as physical activity programs, nutrition, and the use of smart electronic devices. Therefore, the ARDs burden health systems worldwide. Apart from the physiological manifestations of ARDs, specific changes are observed at the cellular and molecular level. A common biochemical/molecular symptom of these diseases is oxidative stress. This condition leads to the disturbance of blood and tissue redox status due to the excessive production of free radicals. Given that free radicals are highly reactive moieties with strong oxidative capacity against biomolecules (i.e., proteins, lipids, DNA), they compromise the efficacy of the intrinsic antioxidant mechanisms and, finally, induce the disruption of redox homeostasis. However, there is no sufficient data linking the levels of redox status of patients with the progression of ARDs over time. Indeed, the onset and symptoms of ARDs are intertwined with the disruption of the patient redox homeostasis and the induction of oxidative stress. Concurrently, the absence of a completely effective pharmaceutical treatment emerges the need for the adoption of novel biomarkers for monitoring the severity of the symptoms and the evolution of ARDs in general. To that end, this study aims at first to investigate the blood redox status of patients with ARDs. Thus, specific redox biomarkers will be evaluated in the blood of patients in three time points (i.e., at Days 1, 180 and 360), and they will be associated with the clinical manifestations of their diseases. The ultimate goal is to clarify whether these biomarkers could putatively exert clinical significance, namely whether they could constitute an additional tool for the monitoring of the progression of these diseases in clinical practice.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease, belonging to the wide spectrum of spondyloarthritis, but with the particularity to be associated with personal psoriasis or familial psoriasis. PsA can be a very disabling disease through progressive and irreversible joint damage. Long-term functional prognosis of patients with PsA is correlated with the presence and severity of the radiographic joint lesions of the disease. However, the proportion of patients who will develop those peripheral joint damages is not yet known and less over the factors which are associated/involved in such an aggressive pattern of the disease. Early identification of this subgroup of patients is particularly important for determining early "intensive" treatment, strict management with a Treat To Target approach, and identification of new treatments with a stronger structural effect. The main objective of this prospective 10 years cohort is to describe the 5 years structural (radiographic) severity of recent Psoriatic arthritis (PsA)with recent peripheral arthritis.Some of the secondary objectives are to describe the 10 years structural severity within those patients, and to determine the predictive factors of those 5 and 10 years radiographic lesions (genetic, environmental, clinic, therapeutic factors). APACHE will provide a unique longitudinal standardized database concerning patients with PsA with very recent peripheral arthritis. Research projects which will based on those collected data should allow to identify the mechanisms of aggressive joint damage, to highlight mew treatments targets, to better describe the burden of the disease, to test previous or develop new assessments tolls, to develop early diagnostic criteria

The purpose of this research study is to determine the effectiveness of adding deucravacitinib to the participant's current Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) treatment to see if it improves their symptoms and quality of life. This study is exploring a new treatment approach that may help improve control of psoriatic disease by targeting different parts of the disease process. By combining therapies that work together, the goal is to offer better symptom relief with fewer or more manageable side effects than some current treatments.

Investigators hypothesize that TNFi is superior to SC MTX in preventing structural damage in early, treatment-naïve PsA, assessed using HR-pQCT. The study aims to ascertain: \- The effect of SC MTX and TNFi (adalimumab biosimilar) on erosion and enthesiophyte progression in early PsA by HR-pQCT. Participants will be: * Randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the SC MTX group or the TNFi group. * HR-pQCT of MCPJ 2-4 will be performed at baseline, week 24, and one year. The primary outcome is the comparison of change in erosion volume over MCPJ 2-4 across 48 weeks between the SC MTX group (group 1) and the TNFi group (group 2), assessed by HR-pQCT.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA), including psoriatic arthritis (PsA), are chronic painful diseases that impair quality of life. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are used to control disease activity, reduce functional disability, and improve prognosis. These include conventional DMARDs such as methotrexate, as well as targeted DMARDs (tDMARDs), i.e., biological agents (bDMARDs) like anti-TNF alpha and JAK inhibitors. Patients treated with tDMARDs face a risk of adverse effects, including an increased risk of infections. Therapeutic patient education has been shown to help patients develop safety skills, but its effectiveness is only short-term. Mobile health applications are increasingly used by patients to manage their health. The French Society of Rheumatology (SFR) has developed a smartphone self-management application aimed at supporting people with inflammatory arthritis in managing their treatments, symptoms, and information needs. It provides advice on lifestyle and daily living, promotes treatment adherence, and enables self-assessment of disease status. The app includes seven features: a safety checklist before treatment administration, daily life aids based on French academic recommendations, treatment reminders, self-assessment of overall well-being, disease monitoring (pain, fatigue, patient global assessment of disease activity), periodic advisory messages, and a diary. The application is not a medical device; collected data are stored on the user's smartphone. Patient data are not directly shared with physicians. Patients can use the app during consultations or share screenshots with their doctors. The app is more widely used and has a longer lifespan than most available apps, but its impact on patients still needs evaluation in a randomized controlled trial. The primary hypothesis of the study is that using the app will improve safety skills in patients with inflammatory arthritis treated with tDMARDs compared to usual care, including access to the SFR patient information website. The secondary hypothesis is that using the app will improve patient adherence and the patient-rheumatologist relationship. Objectives : To determine whether the mobile application improves patients' ability to acquire safety-related skills in the daily use of targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tDMARDs), compared to usual care, including access to an informational website for patients. The primary outcome will be the change in the BioSecure questionnaire score at 6 months after inclusion, comparing the group using the mobile application with the group using the informational website.

The unhide® Project is a non-interventional, longitudinal research study designed to establish a secure data repository of demographic, health, and lifestyle information from individuals with brain inflammation and related neuroinflammatory conditions. Participants in the United States aged 2 years and older will provide self-reported health data, biometrics, and symptom diaries through the MyDataHelps™ app (branded as unhide® for this study). The goal is to create comprehensive longitudinal profiles to facilitate research into disease subtypes, causes, diagnostics, and potential treatments, as well as to identify potential participants for future optional studies. "Healthy" individuals without brain inflammation are also eligible to participate. The digital health research platform used in this study was originally developed and designed by Solve M.E and was called SolveTogether. The Brain Inflammation Collaborative (BIC) expanded upon Solve M.E.'s work to include related diagnoses, pediatric participants, enhance symptom tracking, and more. BIC and Solve M.E. combined Solve Together and unhide®, to create The unhide® Solve Together Unified Platform in 2025.

Early diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) requires close collaboration between dermatologists (as the skin manifestations of psoriatic disease in most cases precede the musculoskeletal manifestations) and rheumatologists (who are usually responsible for the final diagnosis of PsA and treatment of the musculoskeletal manifestations). Previous epidemiological studies suggest that there may still be a significant proportion of undiagnosed PsA patients among those with psoriasis seen by a dermatologist. At the same time, a diagnostic delay of more than 6 months contributes to poor radiological and functional outcomes in PsA patients. Several screening tools / questionnaires (including the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Evaluation - PASE, the Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screen - ToPAS and its further development - TOPAS 2, the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool - PEST, and the Early Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Questionnaire - EARP) have been developed and validated in the past decades - all relying mostly on symptoms reported by a patient with psoriasis without an evaluation / confirmation of the presence of musculoskeletal symptoms by a dermatologist. The CONTEST study, which compared three screening tools (PASE, ToPAS and PEST) in a secondary care setting, determined that they all had a good probability of detecting PsA (sensitivity of approximately 80%) but had poor specificity (approximately 35%). Further analysis of the results of the above study has identified the most discriminative questions from each of the three questionnaires, including questions about the back and neck, and these items have been combined to create a new single 8-item screening questionnaire (CONTEST). However, a subsequent study demonstrated a similar performance for the CONTEST and the PEST tools. This poor specificity means that screening questionnaires are often not used in practice and raises a risk of overwhelming rheumatology referrals. In a recent survey of GRAPPA members, most of the participants (consisting of dermatologists, rheumatologists, and patient research partners), suggested that a basic evaluation of MSK symptoms by a dermatologist in addition to the patient-reported symptoms (questionnaire) should be part of the screening / referral process. We hypothesize, therefore, that adding a MSK evaluation by dermatologist in the screening process will be able to improve the outcome of the screening and referral process in relation to the PsA detection. In this study, we plan to evaluate the performance of a physician (dermatologist)-based screening and referral strategy as compared to the strategy based on a questionnaire completed by a patient for the detection of patients with a high probability of a diagnosis of PsA among patients with psoriasis. The primary endpoint will be the proportion of patients diagnosed with PsA among patients with psoriasis referred to a rheumatologist. This will be evaluated in the following groups: 1) PEST-positive and dermatologist-negative patients 2) PEST-positive and dermatologist-positive patients 3) PEST-negative and dermatologist-positive patients 4) PEST-negative and dermatologist-negative patients The primary comparison of the proportions of patients diagnosed with PsA (Fisher's exact test) will be done between the dermatologist-negative vs. positive patients among PEST-positive ones (group 1 vs. group 2).

The goal of this clinical trial is to study the drug LPX-TI641 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. We will compare the safety and tolerability of LPX-TI641 to placebo that contains no drug. We will also evaluate the plasma pharmacokinetics of LPX-TI641. LPX-TI641 (or placebo) will be administered orally for 28 days.

Based on mass spectrometry flow method, this study analyzed the typing of new T, B, NK and DC cell subsets in peripheral blood of common autoimmune diseases and their correlation with disease activity, aiming at establishing an early screening and diagnosis model of autoimmune diseases.

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effectiveness of a disease activity guided dose reduction strategy of Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) compared to disease activity guided JAKi continuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who are in a state of low disease activity or remission while on JAKi. The main question it aims to answer is: Is a disease activity guided dose reduction strategy for JAKi not inferior in terms of efficacy compared to disease activity guided JAKi continuation in patients with RA/PsA/axSpA that are currently in a low disease activity/remission state? Researchers will compare a disease activity guided dose reduction strategy for JAKi to disease activity guided JAKi continuation in patients with RA/PsA/axSpA that are currently in a low disease activity/remission state to see if a disease activity guided dose reduction strategy for JAKi is not inferior in terms of efficacy compared to disease activity guided JAKi continuation. Participants will: * Follow a JAKi dose reduction strategy or will continue using JAKi in the same dose * Study (telemonitoring) visits are planned every 3 months * At every visit, patients are asked to complete patient-reported outcomes that assess daily functioning, health-related quality of life, pain, fatigue, productivity loss, medical consumption and medication adherence.

This observational study will target patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who have started treatment with bimekizumab, upadacitinib, risankizumab, guselkumab, or a tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor (e.g., adalimumab or etanercept) at NHS hospitals in the United Kingdom. Information from patients' medical records will be collected, and patients will complete surveys about their experiences with their treatment. The study will look at treatment effectiveness from both healthcare professionals' and patients' points of view.

The CARe RAiSE project represents a pioneering translational initiative aimed at advancing precision medicine in the treatment of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The primary objective is the development and implementation of an innovative cell-based ex vivo assay that enables individualized prediction of therapeutic response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). By identifying the most effective treatment option for each patient, this approach seeks to enhance therapeutic efficacy, reduce time to clinical response, and minimize healthcare costs. Despite the availability of numerous DMARDs, clinical decision-making remains largely empirical due to considerable interindividual variability in treatment response. This frequently results in a prolonged trial-and-error process, placing a significant burden on patients and the healthcare system. CARe RAiSE aims to overcome this limitation by providing a functional diagnostic tool that can predict a patient's immunological response to specific DMARDs prior to treatment initiation. The assay is based on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from individual patients, enabling a physiologically relevant assessment of immune responsiveness to targeted therapies. Combining high-content imaging with homogeneous well-based cytokine and inflammasome activity assays, the platform allows for a detailed single-cell analysis of inflammatory pathways. These data are used to generate predictive signatures of treatment response, thereby facilitating a mechanistically informed and personalized therapeutic strategy. Through this approach, CARe RAiSE introduces a scientifically grounded, efficient, and patient-specific method for DMARD selection, with the potential to substantially improve patient outcomes and reduce the socioeconomic impact of autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Background: Inflammatory arthritis (IA) encompasses autoimmune rheumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis. Fatigue is highly prevalent in people with IA with 41-57% suffering from severe fatigue. Patients describe fatigue as overwhelming, unpredictable, challenging to manage, and affecting all areas of everyday life, including the ability to work. Studies have shown that interventions with physical activity or a cognitive behavioral approach can significantly reduce fatigue severity and/or impact in people with IA compared to usual care. To date, no studies have investigated the combined effect of CBA and PA on fatigue severity and impact in patients with IA. Therefore, the goal of this study is to test the feasibility of a newly developed fatigue intervention that combines a cognitive behavioral approach and physical activity (COMFI) in patients with inflammatory arthritis, who experience fatigue as a challenge in their everyday lives in Denmark and Sweden. The intervention will be tested in 4 groups (2 in Denmark and 2 in Sweden), and the participants will participate in 7 group sessions and 2 focusgroups interview in the evaluation. The primary outcome for the participants is fatigue, measured through patient-reported outcomes at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline. This study will show if the intervention is feasible in practice and meaningful for the participants.

The primary goal of this study is to determine whether providing patient honoraria and/or outreach services can improve the attendance rate of appointments at an inner city rheumatology clinic in Vancouver, British Columbia. The main question it aims to answer are: * Does providing a financial honorarium ($20 for each follow-up appointment with completed bloodwork) improve attendance rate at an inner city rheumatology clinic? * Does providing a personalized outreach service for rheumatic diseases improve attendance rate at an inner city rheumatology clinic? The researchers will compare providing patient honoraria to providing both honoraria and outreach services, and compare each of these to the regular appointment schedule without honoraria or outreach. Participants will: * Undergo randomization to receive honoraria or honoraria and outreach services together * Complete surveys about their health and understanding of their rheumatic disease at baseline, 3-month, and 6-month intervals * Visit the clinic every month for check-ups and monitoring bloodwork if they are started on immunosuppressants for their condition

The aim is to assess early right ventricular systolic dysfunction in psoriatic arthritis patients using RV strain echocardiography

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory joint disease that can also affect the liver. Some medications used to treat PsA, such as biological agents (TNF-alpha inhibitors and IL-17 inhibitors), may influence liver health over the long term. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the presence and progression of liver fibrosis (scarring) and hepatic steatosis (fatty liver) in PsA patients treated with TNF-alpha inhibitors or IL-17 inhibitors. The study includes PsA patients who have used biological medications continuously for at least 2 years. Patients' liver health will be assessed using non-invasive tests such as liver ultrasonography and validated biochemical scoring systems (FIB-4, APRI). The findings will be compared with PsA patients treated only with methotrexate (MTX), a commonly used medication known to affect liver health. This study will help understand whether biological therapies (TNF or IL-17 inhibitors) have a positive or negative impact on liver health compared to traditional treatments (MTX) in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

The AYLo study (AutoimmunitY and Loss of y - Investigating the Role of Hematopoietic Mutations and Mosaic Mutation in the Y Chromosome in Autoimmune Rheumatologic Diseases) aims to systematically investigate hematopoietic mutations, such as hematopoietic (mosaic) loss of the Y chromosome (mLOY), focusing on their underlying causes, pathophysiological significance, patterns of manifestation, and impact on disease progression in autoimmune, rheumatologic disorders. This research seeks to bridge existing knowledge gaps by exploring how such mutations influence immune homeostasis, cellular function, and susceptibility to inflammation-driven pathologies. Through the integration of advanced immunological profiling, the study aspires to uncover key mechanisms that drive the initiation, progression, and complications of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. These analyses will combine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) arrays, multiplex assays, transcriptomics, and flow cytometry staining of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to delineate the interplay between hematopoietic mutations and immune dysregulation. A further objective is the development of a multimodal framework for disease-specific characterization, enabling precise mapping of mutation-driven phenotypes across diverse autoimmune conditions. This framework will incorporate clinical, molecular, and imaging data. Additionally, the AYLo study aims to explore the potential role of mLOY and other hematopoietic mutations as biomarkers for disease stratification, prognosis, and therapeutic response. The findings may open avenues for personalized treatment approaches, leveraging the molecular insights to inform targeted interventions and improve patient outcomes in autoimmune rheumatic disorders. By integrating translational and basic science approaches, this study has the potential to redefine current paradigms in autoimmune disease research and therapy.

Ankylosing spondylitis, radiographically negative axial spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, Takayasu arteritis, giant cell arteritis, non-ocular Behcet's disease, and enthesitis-related arthritis are common diseases in rheumatology. Traditional anti-rheumatic drugs are less effective and have greater side effects than biological agents. At present, there has been no large-scale registration study on rheumatic autoimmune diseases such as spondyloarthritis in China. However, data such as patient characteristics, medication patterns, and patient outcome reports of different rheumatology diseases can often serve as a reference for rheumatology clinicians to reasonably select treatment methods for different patients. Therefore, a large-scale registration study is needed to fill the gap in multi-disease registration studies in rheumatology departments in China.