Respiratory Insufficiency

This study aims to determine whether starting respiratory physiotherapy one hour after removal of the breathing tube following elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery leads to better recovery than the current standard approach, in which physiotherapy begins on the first postoperative day. The study will evaluate whether earlier physiotherapy improves lung function, reduces postoperative pulmonary complications, shortens intensive care unit and hospital stay, decreases pain and anxiety, and improves overall recovery after surgery. The main question is whether very early postoperative respiratory physiotherapy provides additional benefits for patients recovering from elective heart surgery compared with standard postoperative care.

The diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a syndromic diagnosis that groups together patients who may have very different prognoses and respond differently to the same therapies. Additionally, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has shown highly contrasting results in the early management of ARDS. One of the predictive criteria for NIV failure is an excessively high tidal volume during non-invasive ventilation. SPIRALI is a pilot study evaluating the relevance of a respiratory physiology parameter, the tidal volume relative to the theoretical ideal body weigh, in the phenotypic classification of non-intubated ARDS patients. In this initial approach, the investigators will compare the tidal volume during high-flow oxygen therapy with the tidal volume obtained under NIV (after applying a settings optimization algorithm). The investigators hypothesize that if tidal volume is linked to each situation, the same patients will exhibit a high tidal volume both during spontaneous ventilation and under NIV.

The goal of this observational study is to learn whether inhaled sedation is a cost-effective alternative to intravenous propofol in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults admitted to the intensive care unit. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does inhaled sedation reduce the total cost of care compared with intravenous propofol? * Does inhaled sedation reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay? * Are adverse events different between patients receiving inhaled sedation and those receiving intravenous propofol? Researchers will compare patients who received inhaled sedation with patients who received intravenous propofol to see if inhaled sedation improves clinical outcomes and reduces overall costs. Participants will: * Be identified through review of electronic medical records * Be included if they are adults who received mechanical ventilation and were sedated with inhaled sedation or intravenous propofol * Contribute data on total costs of care, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, and adverse event

This is a multicenter study to test a decision-making support process for families and clinicians facing decisions about chronic home ventilation for a child. The investigators hypothesize that the intervention will increase family preparedness for decision-making and will improve clinician-family shared-decision making. Half of families will be assigned to "usual care" arm and half to the "intervention" arm. Intervention families will view the study website with study staff and will answer questions related to website content. All families will be interviewed and surveyed at 1, 6 and 12 months after enrollment. Each family will designate 1-2 physician involved in the decision about home ventilation; each physician will be interviewed and surveyed at 1 month.

This study compares the effects of two primary airway humidification methods-active heated humidifiers (HHs) and passive heat-and-moisture exchangers (HMEs)-on trauma intensive care unit (ICU) patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Adequate humidification is essential during mechanical ventilation because artificial airways bypass the body's natural ability to warm and moisten inhaled air. While existing guidelines show no overall superiority of one method over the other in general ICU populations, trauma patients present unique challenges, such as thick or bloody secretions, which may lead to airway obstructions and affect the performance of these devices. The main purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate how active versus passive humidification impacts airway complications (such as secretion viscosity and tube obstruction) and clinical outcomes (including ventilator-associated pneumonia, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and mortality rates). A total of 162 adult trauma patients at Assiut University Hospital will be randomly assigned to either the HH group or the HME group to determine if there are significant clinical differences between the two methods in this specific patient population.

The investigators hypothesize that a simple 3-point tracking device that uses motion sensors attached to the abdomen and chest of a child will provide information regarding thoracoabdominal asynchrony (TAA), a major component of respiratory distress, and ultimately help guide a clinician to initiate, escalate, de-escalate, or stop respiratory support interventions. AIMS To determine if the TAA-monitoring device can be used to detect differences in respiratory synchrony in a manner that is clinically applicable. The investigators hope that the device will detect 1) major asynchrony events in a timely manner so as to prompt clinician intervention during future use; and 2) asynchrony events that may be less visible to the naked eye that may be precursors to more severe events.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a disease that causes weakness of the muscles of the body. The disease can eventually lead to severe breathing problems, which is the most common cause of death from ALS. The treatment for breathing is non-invasive ventilation (NIV). It is a machine that helps a person breathe by pushing air in and out of their lungs through a mask worn over the face. Research has shown that NIV can improve the quality of life and survival of someone with ALS. Unfortunately, NIV is not equally beneficial for everyone. The investigators do not yet know the best time or method for starting NIV in ALS. Europe and Canada allow starting NIV much earlier in ALS than the United States. Current recommendations for starting NIV are based on the opinion of experts rather than large research studies. Medical insurance companies will not cover NIV until significant breathing weakness occurs. After NIV is started, there is no evidence-based guidance on the best way to adjust NIV to benefit patients as much as possible. Some patients have difficulty tolerating NIV, but it is not clear how to identify these individuals ahead of time. The investigators have created a new prediction tool that can identify patients at high risk of breathing problems within the next 6 months. This may help the study team identify who is more likely to benefit from starting NIV early. The investigators have published a paper that shows that NIV helps people with ALS live longer. This paper also showed that patients get more benefit with use NIV for at least 4 hours per day. The investigators published another paper that measured a gas called carbon dioxide (CO2), which goes high if someone's breathing is weakened. This paper showed that patients with ALS may live longer when CO2 levels are lowered using NIV. The investigators also have data suggesting that certain characteristics may predict who is less likely to use NIV at least 4 hours per day. In this study, the investigators will collect pilot data on starting early NIV in individuals with ALS who do not yet meet insurance criteria for covering NIV. The research team will first use their previously published prediction tool to identify patient risk. Then, subjects would be randomized to start early NIV or to usual care. The usual care group would eventually start NIV as would occur if the participants were not in the study. The purpose of this study is to collect data to help the investigators plan a larger randomized clinical trial. This study has 4 objectives. First, the project aims to identify individuals who would benefit from earlier NIV. The research team will use the original prediction tool to identify risk of severe breathing problems within the next 6 months. Second, the project aims to show that it is feasible to start NIV early. Third, the project aims to gather data on the effect of randomization on symptoms, CO2 levels, and outcomes. Fourth, the project aims to identify traits that may make someone less likely to use NIV.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if abdominal functional electrical stimulation (FES) using the VentFree Respiratory Muscle Stimulator improves cough strength in adults with a new spinal cord injury (SCI). It will also learn about the safety of abdominal FES in this population. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does abdominal FES improve cough peak flow (a measure of cough strength) compared to cough training alone? Does abdominal FES reduce the number of respiratory complications (such as pneumonia or atelectasis)? What medical problems do participants have when receiving abdominal FES? Researchers will compare abdominal FES (active treatment) to supervised cough training without stimulation (control) to see if abdominal FES improves cough function after spinal cord injury. Participants will: Receive abdominal FES or perform supervised cough training 5 days per week for up to 6 weeks during inpatient rehabilitation Have cough strength and breathing function measured at the start of the study and every week during treatment Complete quality of life and bowel function questionnaires at multiple time points Have a follow-up visit or phone call 4 weeks after completing treatment

This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties, including reliability and validity, of the Turkish version of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire for Non-Invasive Ventilation (S3-NIV). The S3-NIV is a specific tool designed to assess difficulties and compliance in patients receiving home non-invasive ventilation. A total of 120 stable patients using home NIV for at least 3 months will be enrolled across multiple centers.

The purpose of this multicenter, randomized controlled trial (ULTRASVENT-2) is to evaluate the effect of different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels on postoperative oxygenation and lung aeration in adult patients undergoing elective non-cardiac and non-thoracic surgery under general anesthesia. Moving away from traditional binary outcomes, this study utilizes a continuous functional metric, the non-invasive oxygenation index SpO2/FiO2 (S/F ratio), as the primary endpoint to precisely capture the degree of respiratory function preservation. Patients will be stratified into four distinct surgical cohorts based on the type and aggressiveness of the procedure: non-abdominal surgery, major open abdominal surgery, major laparoscopic abdominal surgery, and low-trauma laparoscopic surgery. This adaptive design aims to investigate how protective PEEP strategies interact with varying degrees of surgical trauma and intraoperative pneumoperitoneum, allowing the optimization of mechanical ventilation parameters for routine clinical practice.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the effects of inhaled nitric oxide on oxygenation and lung perfusion in participants with severe obesity who have acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and are on mechanical ventilation The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. In acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, what are the effects of inhaled nitric oxide on oxygenation in participants with severe obesity compared to participants with normal body weight. 2. In acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, what are the effects of inhaled nitric oxide on lung perfusion and heart function in participants with severe obesity compared to participants with normal body weight. 3. In acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, does severe obesity impact nitric oxide signaling pathways? Participants with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure will be exposed to inhaled nitric oxide (20 ppm) while being clinically monitored.

The primary objective of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the effectiveness of combining the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) and CRP-Albumin-Lymphocyte (CALLY) index to predict weaning success in adult patients within the intensive care unit. While weaning from mechanical ventilation is a critical clinical step, existing physiological metrics like RSBI do not fully capture a patient's inflammatory or nutritional status. This research introduces the CALLY index calculated as the ratio of the patient's immuno-nutritional reserve (Albumin and Lymphocytes) to systemic inflammation (CRP) as a complementary metabolic marker. By tracking approximately 105 participants at Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, the study monitors weaning success over both a 48 hour and a 7 day period to identify both immediate and late phase extubation failures. The ultimate goal is to provide a more holistic prediction model that potentially reduces re-intubation rates and improves clinical outcomes by accurately identifying the optimal time for ventilator removal.

PRACTICAL is a randomized multifactorial adaptive platform trial for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). This platform trial will evaluate novel interventions for patients with AHRF across a range of severity states (i.e., not intubated, intubated with lower or higher respiratory system elastance, requiring extracorporeal life support) and across a range of investigational phases (i.e., preliminary mechanistic trials, full-scale clinical trials). AHRF is a common and life-threatening clinical syndrome affecting millions globally every year. Patients with AHRF are at high risk of death and long-term morbidity. Patients who require invasive mechanical ventilation are at risk of ventilator-induced lung injury and ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction. New treatments and treatment strategies are needed to improve outcomes for these very ill patients. Utilizing advances in Bayesian adaptive trial design, the platform will facilitate efficient yet rigorous testing of new treatments for AHRF, with a particular focus on mechanical ventilation strategies and extracorporeal life support techniques as well as pharmacological agents and new medical devices. The platform is designed to enable evaluation of novel interventions at a variety of stages of investigation, including pilot and feasibility trials, trials focused on mechanistic surrogate endpoints for preliminary clinical evaluation, and full-scale clinical trials assessing the impact of interventions on patient-centered outcomes. A domain is defined as a set of interventions that are intended to act on specific mechanisms of injury using different variations of a common therapeutic strategy. A domain may also be a non-interventional study that addresses observational research questions by collecting specific data or outcomes that are not collected as part of other domains. Domains are intended to function independently of each other, allowing independent evaluation of multiple therapies and mechanistic pathways within the same patient. Once feasibility is established, Bayesian adaptive statistical modelling will be used to evaluate treatment efficacy at regular interim adaptive analyses of the pre-specified outcomes for each intervention in each domain. These adaptive analyses will compute the posterior probabilities of superiority, futility, inferiority, or equivalence for pre-specified comparisons within domains. Each of these potential conclusions will be pre-defined prior to commencing the intervention trial. Decisions about trial results (e.g., concluding superiority or equivalence) will be based on pre-specified threshold values for posterior probability. The primary outcome of interest, the definitions for superiority, futility, etc. (i.e., the magnitude of treatment effect) and the threshold values of posterior probability required to reach conclusions for superiority, futility etc., will vary from intervention to intervention depending on the phase of investigation and the nature of the intervention being evaluated. All of these parameters will be pre-specified as part of the statistical design for each intervention trial. In general, domains will be designed to evaluate treatment effect within four discrete clinical states: non-intubated patients, intubated patients with low respiratory system elastance (\<2.5 cm H2O/(mL/kg)), intubated patients with high respiratory system elastance (≥2.5 cm H2O/(mL/kg)), and patients requiring extracorporeal life support. Where appropriate, the model will specify dynamic borrowing between states to maximize statistical information available for trial conclusions. In this perpetual trial design, different interventions may be added or dropped over time. Where possible, the platform will be embedded within existing data collection repositories to enable greater efficiency in outcome ascertainment. Standardized systems for acquiring both physiological and biological measurements are embedded in the platform, to be acquired at sites with appropriate training, expertise, and facilities to collect those measurements.

Major abdominal surgery is associated with a substantial risk of early postoperative pulmonary complications, including atelectasis, hypoxemia, pneumonia, and increased need for respiratory support. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) provides warmed and humidified oxygen at high flow rates and may improve oxygenation, reduce respiratory workload, and support lung volume during the immediate postoperative period. However, whether routine prophylactic HFNC after major abdominal surgery reduces clinically significant postoperative pulmonary complications remains uncertain. This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether prophylactic HFNC applied for 24 hours immediately after extubation reduces postoperative pulmonary complications compared with standard postoperative respiratory care in adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery under general anesthesia with an actual anesthetic duration of 3 hours or longer.

Study Overview The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether an improved non invasive ventilation mask with airway washout can reduce how often people need to breathe and perform as well as standard NIV masks when used with different ventilators, in people receiving NIV therapy for respiratory distress or respiratory insufficiency. The main question(s) it aims to answer are: * Does the new mask reduce breathing rate compared with a standard NIV mask? * Does the ventilator perform as expected when used with the new mask, including pressure delivery and leak? * Do clinicians and participants find the new mask fits and functions well? Three iterations of the new mask (vented, non-vented, dual limb) will be compared to standard of care to see if the mask reduces the need to breathe and performs consistently across ventilators compared with usual NIV masks. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ What Participants Will Do Participants will wear two different NIV masks, each for one hour, during a single study session lasting approximately 2.5 hours. Participants will be asked to: * Wear a small, stick on carbon dioxide (CO₂) sensor on the skin. * Use their usual NIV mask for one hour while ventilator data are collected. * Switch to the investigational mask for one hour while ventilator data are collected. * Choose whether to return to their original mask or remain on the investigational mask after the study period. * Caregiver opinion on the mask will be collected. Participants may also choose (optional): * To have three small blood samples taken (These samples are optional, and participants can still take part in the study if they decline them.) * One when they agree to take part in the study * One when the investigational mask is fitted * One after wearing the investigational mask for one hour * To provide feedback on how the two masks felt and performed. During the study, researchers will collect data from the ventilator, including: * Breathing rate and depth * NIV pressure settings * Amount of air leak Research staff will also complete a short form assessing how well the mask fit and functioned. Participants will remain in the study until the investigational mask is removed.

Fasting in intensive care is mainly studied in mechanically ventilated patients or those in the weaning phase. Recent research challenge the common assumption of fasting and suggests that continuing enteral nutrition before extubation may be beneficial. Fasting is also practiced before procedures (e.g., tracheostomy, endoscopy) or surgeries, based on anesthetic guidelines. Yet, no data address fasting in non-intubated ICU patients with acute respiratory failure, despite frequent caloric deficits and inadequate nutritional intake. Aspiration risk often justifies fasting, but studies indicate that swallowing reflexes remain intact in patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen or non-invasive ventilation. Moreover, although intubation carries a 2-5.9% aspiration risk, rapid sequence induction mitigates this, questioning the necessity of preventive fasting. Despite its prevalence, this practice lacks scientific validation and guideline support. Patient discomfort is also significant. Hunger and thirst are major sources of distress, and evidence from anesthesiology suggests that allowing fluid intake pre-anesthesia reduces discomfort. Extrapolating these findings to ICU patients could improve well-being. In conclusion, fasting in ICU patients may contribute to discomfort, dehydration, and malnutrition, while its protective benefits remain uncertain. We hypothesize that maintaining oral intake does not increase the risk of intubation or aspiration-related complications.

People undergoing repair of large ventral hernias can develop breathing problems after surgery, especially around the time when the abdominal wall is closed. During closure, pressure inside the abdomen may increase and lung mechanics can worsen. This study will evaluate a structured intraoperative decision approach that uses standard anesthesia measurements of static respiratory system compliance at predefined timepoints to support the choice of abdominal wall closure technique. The main goal is to assess the rate of early postoperative respiratory failure within 72 hours after surgery.

The goal of this double blinded randomized control trial is to learn if percutaneous cryoablation of traumatic rib fractures improves outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does percutaneous cryoablation improve short and long term pain scores? Does percutaneous cryoablation improve short and long term respiratory mechanics? Does percutaneous cryoablation improve long term quality of life? Does percutaneous cryoablation decrease delirium? Researchers will compare cryoablation to standard multimodal pain therapy to see if this impacts respiratory recovery. Participants will undergo randomization, percutaneous cryoablative procedure, and participate in tests at pre-determined intervals to evaluate their pulmonary recovery.

PNEUMA is a preliminary safety and feasibility trial of a novel approach to the titration of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) to safe spontaneous breathing in patients with moderate to severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) supported with invasive mechanical ventilation.

The goal of this interventional trial is to learn about lung volume recruitment (LVR) and expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) in a total of up to 39 patients diagnosed with ALS. The following aims will be addressed: 1. Determine the impact of combined LVR and EMST on cough strength and respiratory function in individuals with ALS. 2. Determine the impact of combined LVR and EMST on patient-reported dyspnea and bulbar impairment. 3. Describe the effect of combined LVR and EMST on patient- and caregiver reported burden and quality of life.

The objective of this randomized cross-over trial is to assess the physiological effects of three different facemasks for noninvasive ventilation (Nivairo, Visairo, Optiniv) in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure

The goal of this interventional study is to evaluate the effect of different positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) on lung and diaphragm function in patients mechanically ventilated with pressure support ventilation in the intensive care unit. The main questions aim to answer: Does higher PEEP level affect diaphragm contractions and ventilatory efficiency? Does higher PEEP level limit inspiratory efforts? Does higher PEEP level affect lung compliance? The participants will be subjected to three different PEEP levels during pressure support ventilation: Low PEEP (4 cmH2O), Medium PEEP (10 cmH2O), High PEEP (16 cmH2O). The lung and diaphragm function will be evaluated using high-resolution esophageal manometry, electrical activity of the diaphragm, external diaphragm ultrasound and spirometric ventilator data.

Sedation remains a ubiquitous and crucial component of intensive care treatments in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. Sedation relieves anxiety, reduces distress, and promotes tolerance of endotracheal intubation and associated life-sustaining interventions such as mechanical ventilation, cardiovascular assistance, and renal support. Thus, choosing the optimal sedative agent is vital to patient comfort, safety, and survival. Despite more than 20 years of intensive care sedation research, there is still no consensus on what constitutes best sedation practice. The Society of Critical Care Medicine, the premier critical care organisation in North America, published the 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility and Sleep (PADIS) disruption (chaired by our primary applicant W.A.) and issued weak recommendations to provide analgesia before sedation, to target light sedation whenever clinically feasible, and to use either dexmedetomidine or propofol over midazolam for the sedation of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Similarly, the American Thoracic Society produced a set of Clinical Practice Guidelines to promote liberation and weaning from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients, with weak recommendations for the use of non-benzodiazepines as primary sedatives and to target light sedation when clinically possible. A weak recommendation was issued in an Intensive Care Medicine Rapid Practice Guideline published in 2022 to use dexmedetomidine over propofol for sedation of critically ill adults, if the desired outcome is a reduction in delirium. These guidelines, however, do not consider age-dependent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, illness severity, timing of sedative administration, operative vs medical reason for admission, or the changing dynamics of sedation practice at different phases of critical illness. The lack of high-level evidence to inform sedation practice in the critically ill has led to approaches that are mainly opinion-based and lack the support of evidence from large multicentre, international randomised clinical trials.

Pressure injury (PI) is characterized as damage to the skin and/or underlying tissues resulting from sustained pressure or a combination of pressure and shear forces between the patient and the support surface. Prolonged pressure is a well-established risk factor in the development of PIs. Frequent repositioning and routine patient care have been recognized for decades as integral components of PI prevention and treatment protocols. The duration of interface pressure is as critical as its magnitude. When interface pressure exceeds the mean capillary blood pressure, blood flow can be compromised, leading to ischemia in affected areas, which may progress to necrosis if sustained over time. Furthermore, it is widely accepted in the literature that tissue becomes at risk when interface pressure exceeds 30 to 32 mmHg. In this context, continuous lateral rotation therapy (CLRT) offers a potential alternative for managing critically ill patients. CLRT involves continuous mechanical rotation of the patient in the lateral plane. However, its effects on skin integrity remain poorly understood. Despite the rationale behind and widespread recommendation of repositioning, the lack of robust evaluations on how repositioning impacts interface pressure creates uncertainty, underscoring the need for high-quality trials to assess different strategies for implementation. Although lateralization is a pragmatic strategy for preventing pressure injuries, its use in critically ill patients requires an integrated assessment of respiratory, hemodynamic, and gastroesophageal effects. Therefore, this study proposes an innovative approach by evaluating, for the first time, the effectiveness of automated postural change with simultaneous monitoring of tissue integrity, pulmonary function, cardiovascular stability, and gastroesophageal protection. The aim is to optimize pressure injury prevention, improve pulmonary mechanics, ensure hemodynamic stability, and preserve gastroesophageal safety in critically ill patients.

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is commonly offered to people with Motor Neurone Disease (MND) who have breathing difficulties. It improves their quality of life and can prolong life by 6 months or more. It is initially used at night and typically set up during a hospital admission. By the time that they develop respiratory failure and need to start NIV, however, most patients require wheelchairs or have other significant health problems. Repeated travel to hospitals is increasingly difficult with increasing disability. It is possible to start and monitor NIV treatment at home. This may be more convenient for selected patients, though starting NIV is quite complex; it is not known if home treatment is as safe and effective as hospital-based treatment. To establish this, 60 patients with MND who have indications for NIV will be recruited. They will be randomly allocated to a home-based treatment (home NIV set up plus home visits supported by telemonitoring) or hospital-based care (inpatient NIV set up plus outpatient NIV monitoring) and followed up at 1, 4 and 7 months. Alongside measures of treatment effectiveness, assessment of patient and carer preferences, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness will be undertaken. In the additional qualitative part on this study, interviews with patients who took part in the main study and their carers will be conducted to understand in more depth their perspective on what makes for a good or bad experience with NIV, how the environment (home vs hospital) influences their NIV experience and what personal factors determine NIV use. Findings from the interviews will inform the design of a truly patient-centred NIV service.