Severe Preeclampsia

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy complication characterized by high blood pressure associated with damage to various organs, especially the kidneys. It happens in about 1 to 5% of pregnant women and can cause serious problems for both the mother and the baby. Several multi-omics studies have already been conducted on preeclampsia, with promising results. However, this is preliminary data that requires further studies. The molecular markers identified in this type of study could potentially be used, first of all, for the early screening of this condition, which is not yet reliably achievable. In addition, the knowledge gained from this research would help us better understand the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Therefore, the investigators' goal is to carry out a multi-omics analysis of preeclampsia to uncover the genetic and molecular mechanisms involved in this condition.

Preeclampsia is a serious pregnancy complication caused by abnormal placental development and function. It can lead to high blood pressure and damage to organs such as the liver, kidneys, brain, or cardiovascular system. In these cases, the only definitive treatment is delivery. However, deciding when to deliver is challenging: delaying delivery increases risks for both mother and baby, while delivering too early increases complications related to prematurity. This study aims to evaluate whether a blood test measuring the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio an angiogenic marker that reflects placental function and predicts complications more accurately than traditional clinical criteria can help determine the optimal timing of delivery in women with severe preeclampsia between 30 weeks and 33 weeks plus 6 days of gestation. It is a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in 11 referral hospitals in Spain and will include 386 singleton pregnancies. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the control group, standard expectant management will be followed, aiming to continue the pregnancy until 34 weeks if maternal and fetal conditions remain stable, and the sFlt-1/PlGF results will be masked. In the study group, delivery timing will be guided by the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio: if the ratio is greater than 655, delivery will be planned from 30 weeks onward; if greater than 110, delivery will be planned from 34 weeks; and if 110 or lower, pregnancy may continue until 37 weeks. The study has two primary outcomes. The first is a composite of severe maternal complications, including neurological, hepatic, renal, respiratory, or cardiovascular dysfunction, severe hypertension, placental abruption, or fetal death. The second is a composite of neonatal complications, including admission to the neonatal intensive care unit or neonatal death. The goal is to demonstrate that using angiogenic markers reduces maternal complications without significantly increasing neonatal complications. If successful, this approach could support more individualized management of early-onset severe preeclampsia, improving maternal safety while carefully balancing the risks of prematurity for the newborn.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluates whether oral furosemide 40 mg, initiated 12 hours postpartum, reduces hospital length of stay compared to placebo (folic acid 5 mg) in postpartum women with severe preeclampsia. Secondary outcomes include need for rescue antihypertensive medications, weight reduction, and metabolic safety (hypokalemia, renal function). A total of 186 participants (93 per arm) will be enrolled across two hospitals in Honduras.

Severe preeclampsia is a serious pregnancy complication that can lead to severe maternal and fetal outcomes, particularly when blood pressure is not adequately controlled. In France, intravenous labetalol is recommended as the first-line treatment for severe hypertension in preeclampsia. However, in clinical practice, failure to control blood pressure with labetalol is frequently observed, and the factors associated with this lack of response remain poorly understood. The RELAPSE study is a prospective, multicenter observational study designed to identify factors associated with failure of blood pressure control with intravenous labetalol monotherapy in patients with severe preeclampsia. The main hypothesis is that certain patient characteristics, such as maternal clinical profile, obstetric history, or biological parameters, may be associated with a higher risk of treatment failure. Identifying these factors could help clinicians better anticipate inadequate response to labetalol and adapt treatment strategies more rapidly. Data will be collected from routine clinical care without modifying patient management. Patients will be followed from the initiation of intravenous labetalol until hospital discharge. The study will include approximately 350 patients across multiple centers. By improving the understanding of predictors of treatment failure, this study aims to contribute to better management of severe preeclampsia and to reduce maternal and neonatal complications.

The goal of this study is to compare levetiracetam to magnesium sulfate for the prevention of eclamptic seizures in pregnant persons with severe preeclampsia that are 32 or more weeks pregnant. This is an equivalence study so our primary goal is to see no difference in the incidence of seizure in the two groups. Since side effects can be a significant problem with magnesium sulfate and these patients are at significant risk of life threatening complications, we also plan to evaluate several secondary outcomes in the mothers and the babies, including: severe allergic reaction, magnesium toxicity, ICU admission, hospital readmission, transfusion for any reason, pulmonary edema, cardiomyopathy, Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome, eclamptic seizure, loss of vision, stroke, renal injury requiring dialysis, cardiac arrest, maternal death, unexpected stillbirth or neonatal death, NICU admission, Apgars and length of neonatal respiratory support.

There is still no evidence of the appropriate dose to be used. Serum magnesium sulfate concentration is not measured regularly, thus we may be using sub-therapeutic level or reaching a toxic level.Overweight and obese women have different pharmacokinetics and different drug distribution, therefore, they may need higher doses of magnesium sulfate to reach therapeutic level.