Aortic Stenosis

The purpose of this study is to generate clinical evidence on valve safety and performance in subjects treated by redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR).

The goal of this observational study is to understand the processes of what causes and accelerates the disease progress in aortic stenosis and following aortic valve replacement. Participants will undergo transthoracic echocardiography every 6 months, with annual visits for state-of-the-art scanning techniques including positron-emission tomography combined with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging with radiotracers designed to look at disease processes including fibrosis, calcification, inflammation and thrombosis activity.

This trial aims to improve the heart health of people with a narrowed aortic valve called aortic stenosis (AS) who then have aortic valve replacement (AVR) by assessing the change in the mass of the left ventricle. Even after an AVR in many patients the heart is still unable to pump as well and can lead to heart failure. This study will assess if medication used in other causes of heart failure can help participants having an AVR recover better. Researchers will compare two drugs, dapagliflozin and spironolactone, that have been shown to help patients with heart failure who do not have AS, to see if taking one or both medicines together will help patients with AS. There will be four treatment arms: dapagliflozin, spironolactone, dapagliflozin and spironolactone together, and standard of care. These will be taken as one tablet of each IMP per day for 12 months. Participants will have approximately four follow up visits, dependent on the treatment arm - those in an arm with spironolactone will have an extra safety follow up visit. These medicines might help patients after AVR by reducing heart muscle thickness and scarring.

The objective of this pivotal, prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and clinical performance of the Next-Generation INOVARE® SAFESYNC Bioprosthetic Heart Valve, implanted via a transcatheter approach, in patients with severe aortic stenosis, an indication for TAVI, and intermediate or higher surgical risk. The study will enroll 40 participants.

To establish the safety and effectiveness of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with isolated severe, calcific aortic stenosis who are at low surgical risk.

This prospective, single-center observational study aims to evaluate the relationship between changes in aortic valve hemodynamics and pulmonary congestion in patients undergoing elective transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Pulmonary congestion will be assessed non-invasively using lung ultrasound, with particular emphasis on B-lines, at predefined time points before and after TAVI. Changes in aortic valve area and other echocardiographic parameters will be evaluated in relation to changes in lung ultrasound findings. The primary objective is to determine the association between improvement in aortic valve area following TAVI and changes in pulmonary congestion.

The objective of this study is to demonstrate safety and efficacy of the EmStop Embolic Protection System when used as indicated to capture and remove thrombus/debris during self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures.

TRACS-PRIME is a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial evaluating whether transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) can be performed safely and effectively in selected hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery, when appropriate patient selection, experienced operators, advanced imaging, and established transfer pathways are available. The study will include patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who have an indication for TAVI confirmed by a multidisciplinary Heart Team. Eligible patients will be randomized to undergo TAVI either in a center without on-site cardiac surgery or in a center with on-site cardiac surgery. All procedures will be performed according to current standards of care by experienced TAVI operators. The main purpose of the study is to determine whether TAVI performed in centers without on-site cardiac surgery is not inferior to TAVI performed in centers with on-site cardiac surgery with respect to clinical outcomes at 1 year. The primary clinical outcome includes death from any cause, stroke, or hospitalization related to the procedure or the implanted valve. The study will also assess safety outcomes, including valve-related death and major procedural or technical complications. Participants will be followed after hospital discharge to assess clinical events, safety, and longer-term outcomes. An independent committee blinded to treatment allocation will review clinical events, and an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board will monitor patient safety during the trial.

The primary purpose of this study is to observe reduced access site complications in patients with heavily calcified common femoral arteries requiring Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)

Heart valve disease and weakened heart muscle (left ventricular systolic dysfunction) are common in older adults and often go undetected until serious complications such as heart failure develop. Detection currently depends on a clinician hearing a murmur and then ordering an echocardiogram, which is easily missed or delayed. This study tests whether a brief, artificial intelligence (AI)-guided handheld heart ultrasound - point-of-care ultrasound, or POCUS - performed by trained clinic staff during a routine visit identifies these conditions earlier than usual care. Primary care and geriatrics providers, rather than individual patients, are assigned by chance to one of two groups. Patients seen by providers in the AI-ultrasound group are offered a POCUS scan and a one-time blood test at their regular visit, and are referred for a confirmatory echocardiogram if the scan is abnormal. Patients seen by providers in the usual care group receive standard clinic care. Researchers will compare how often previously undiagnosed structural heart disease is newly identified in each group.

This study will collect physiologic data in patients with cardiovascular conditions and observe the natural history of those conditions for research purposes.

Evaluation of clinical outcomes and valve performance of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra Resilia (S3UR) valve over 10 years.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis across a broad range of surgical risk. Advances in device technology and procedural techniques have enabled minimalist approaches and shorter hospital stays. Preliminary observational studies suggest that same-day discharge after TAVI may be feasible and safe in carefully selected patients, but randomized evidence remains limited, particularly in patients treated with self-expanding valves. The HOME-TAVI trial is a prospective, multicenter, international, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate whether a same-day discharge strategy is non-inferior to standard hospital discharge after successful transfemoral TAVI with the Medtronic Evolut PRO+/FX/FX+ system. Eligible patients who remain clinically stable 6 hours after the procedure will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to same-day discharge or standard-of-care discharge. The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause mortality, type 2-4 bleeding, stroke, and hospital readmission within 30 days after TAVI. Secondary objectives include assessment of quality of life, patient-reported experience measures, healthcare resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness.

This multicenter, prospective, randomized superiority trial will evaluate whether systematic 14-day ambulatory ECG monitoring following hospital discharge after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) reduces the risk of sudden death, symptomatic arrhythmic events, or stroke within 1 year compared with standard post-discharge care. Patients undergoing successful TAVI without permanent pacemaker implantation and presenting with at least one ECG conduction abnormality at hospital discharge will be randomized to receive either ambulatory ECG monitoring or standard follow-up. All participants will undergo routine clinical follow-up at 30 days and 1 year after TAVI.

The goal of this study is to learn what effects the ABC Bicuspid Sizing Algorithm has on the clinical outcomes of patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis after having a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using the Sapien 3 valve. The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1. Does the ABC Bicuspid Sizing Algorithm increase the technical success at exit from the procedure room? 2. Does the ABC Bicuspid Sizing Algorithm increase the device success at 30 days after the procedure? Participants already being evaluated for a TAVR as part of their regular medical care for bicuspid aortic stenosis will have their diagnostic images assessed using the ABC Bicuspid Sizing Algorithm to help determine their procedure type and valve size. They will have visits 30 days and annually till 5 years after their procedure.

Aortic stenosis (AS) affects approximately 5% of individuals \>65 years old, with \~3% of people \>75 years having moderate to severe disease. The prevalence of AS is rising rapidly due to an ageing population and is projected to double in the next two decades. Increasingly clinicians face the dilemma of how to best manage this growing population of mainly elderly patients, many of whom are asymptomatic but have been identified as having severe AS, often as an incidental finding. Reduced aortic valve opening progresses over decades without any apparent symptoms because the heart compensates for the AS. Ultimately, compensatory mechanisms fail resulting in angina, syncope or heart failure. If these symptomatic patients with severe AS remain untreated, they have a dire prognosis. In this situation the only effective treatment is AVR, either surgically or using TAVI. Conversely, conventional teaching and clinical practice in cardiology has been that, in the absence of symptoms, the prognosis is usually excellent and, except in a few very specific circumstances, conservative management and regular review (expectant management) is recommended. This advice is reflected in current international guidelines but is based largely on historical precedent. There has never been a randomised controlled trial to address the relative benefits of early AVR versus expectant management in patients with severe asymptomatic AS. The relative benefits of a strategy of early AVR/TAVI versus expectant management in patients with asymptomatic severe AS are unclear. There is clinical equipoise but it remains one of the few areas of cardiovascular medicine where no randomised controlled trials (RCT) have been performed. The EASY-AS study will provide crucial data on the relative merits of these differing approaches to management, in terms of important patient orientated outcomes, conventional cardiovascular end-points and cost effectiveness.

AoS-SEDAI study is an observational, multicenter, retrospective and prospective clinical study. This study aims to assess Willem Artificial Intelligence (AI) ability to distinguish between aortic stenosis (AS) and non-AS patients from 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) data.

This study aims to utilise novel biomarkers assessing thrombosis and thrombolysis (through a blood test), to identify patients undergoing either surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) who are at risk of thrombosis, and relate this to clinical thrombotic and thromboembolic adverse events and subclinical valve thrombosis, and identify the timeframe of greatest risk for valve thrombosis.

Evaluation of the safety and performance of the Navitor TAVI System in a Global Study

Remote-AS aims to develop a remote digital monitoring cohort of people with AS and use these data to establish a digital twin intervention to personalise risks and benefits, and optimise the time of surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR) referral. Our digital solution will also seek modelling for optimal care for patients to whom AVR is indicated who choose not to undergo the procedure, supporting a patient-selected observational strategy for managing heart failure symptoms, facilitating patient education and self-care. Objectives of the study are: * To establish a large-scale interdisciplinary research program to drive implementation of substantial improvements to health care and/or health system effectiveness in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) * To establish a new model of patient-centred management strategy for asymptomatic severe AS to inform the optimal time at which valve intervention should take place * For patients to whom AVR is indicated who choose not to undergo the procedure, to support a patient-selected observational strategy for managing heart failure symptoms * To develop a digital twin with predictive capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) for guiding the optimal timing of AVR in patients with asymptomatic severe AS Participants will be patients with asymptomatic moderate to severe native AS (n=160) (based on guideline-recommended diagnosis and care with peak aortic velocity \>3.5m/sec). Participants will undergo: Wearables: collection of physiological (e.g., blood pressure, heart rate, rhythm) and behavioural (physical activity) data through a wearable device ('smart watch'), collected through the comprehensive remote heart health monitoring and automated feedback delivery system app SMART. Patient reported outcome measures: KCCQ-CSS; EQ-5D-5L index score; "Toronto Aortic Stenosis" quality of life questionnaires. Advanced cardiovascular imaging: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging; 31phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS); proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS); echocardiography. Comprehensive plasma proteome profiling: Plasma proteomic preparation coupled with the Orbitrap Astral mass spectrometer. Recording of clinical outcomes.

Biomarkers and mechanisms in the progression of aortic valve stenosis are sometimes not sufficiently understood. The current project will take into account image morphological and immunological aspects that predict the development of hemodynamically relevant aortic valve stenosis in order to identify high-risk patients and to develop further therapeutic options.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of pelacarsen (TQJ230) administered subcutaneously once monthly compared to placebo in slowing the progression of calcific aortic valve stenosis.

The Echo-AVCS Study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter observational study designed to derive and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based echocardiographic aortic valve calcium score (Echo-AVCS) for confirming severe aortic stenosis (AS). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the standard imaging modality for assessing AS severity; however, discrepancies between valve area and transvalvular gradient measurements may complicate diagnosis, particularly in low-flow or discordant AS presentations. Cardiac computed tomography (CT)-derived aortic valve calcium scoring is currently used to resolve diagnostic uncertainty, but it involves additional cost and radiation exposure. This study will enroll consecutive adult patients undergoing clinically indicated TTE and cardiac CT with calcium scoring performed within 3 months. Standardized echocardiographic images will be centrally analyzed using dedicated AI-based image segmentation and machine learning methods to quantify aortic valve calcification directly from TTE images. CT-derived aortic valve calcium score will serve as the reference standard. The primary objective is to derive and validate the Echo-AVCS score for identifying severe AS. Secondary objectives include determination of sex-specific diagnostic thresholds, correlation with CT calcium volume, association with symptoms and NYHA class, and evaluation of prognostic associations with aortic valve replacement, heart failure hospitalization, cardiovascular events, and mortality at 1-year follow-up.

The purpose of this study is to see if having the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) procedure done in a hospital with onsite cardiac surgery available or not, makes a difference on participant outcomes. Current standard of care is to have this procedure done in a hospital with onsite cardiac surgery available. Hypothesis The investigators hypothesize that the TAVR in experienced interventional cardiac centers without on-site cardiac surgery will be safe and effective. Although this is happening clinically in select regions internationally, this change in the clinical application of TAVI requires a rigorous assessment of safety with a robust randomized trial and multicenter international collaboration.

Aortic stenosis is a condition in which the aortic valve becomes narrow and does not open properly, making it harder for the heart to pump blood to the body. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive procedure commonly used to treat this condition, especially in older patients or patients at high surgical risk. Many patients undergoing TAVI also have leakage of the mitral valve and/or tricuspid valve. These valve problems can cause symptoms such as shortness of breath, fatigue, swelling, heart failure, and repeated hospitalizations. Patients with multiple valve diseases generally have worse outcomes and are more difficult to treat. In some patients, mitral or tricuspid valve leakage improves after TAVI because the heart works better once the aortic valve has been treated. However, in other patients, the leakage remains severe and continues to affect their health and quality of life. New minimally invasive treatments are now available to repair or replace the mitral and tricuspid valves, but doctors still do not know the best order or timing for these procedures. This study aims to evaluate a treatment algorithm for patients with severe aortic stenosis and significant mitral and/or tricuspid valve leakage. The proposed approach follows current clinical guidelines and uses a stepwise strategy. Patients will first undergo TAVI, followed by reassessment of the mitral and tricuspid valves. If important valve leakage persists after TAVI, additional minimally invasive procedures may be considered to treat the mitral or tricuspid valve. The study will include patients with severe aortic stenosis and moderate-to-severe or severe mitral and/or tricuspid regurgitation. Researchers will collect information about patient symptoms, heart imaging results, procedures, hospitalizations, quality of life, and clinical outcomes during follow-up. The main goal of the study is to evaluate whether this staged treatment approach is safe, feasible, and effective in improving patient outcomes. Researchers will also assess whether the strategy can reduce hospitalizations for heart failure and improve symptoms, daily functioning, and quality of life. The results of this study may help doctors better manage patients with multiple valve diseases and provide a more personalized and structured treatment approach for this complex group of patients.