Wound Healing

Healing after dental surgery can vary from person to person. This study is being done to understand how body weight (obesity vs. normal weight) may affect healing after tissue is removed from the roof of the mouth during a gum graft procedure. The study will also evaluate whether a healing material made from a participant's own blood, called platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), is comparable in quantity and quality to the standard-of-care collagen plug. First, participants will be classified into obese or normal weight groups. Next, participants will be randomized to receive either collagen plug or platelet-rich fibrin clot during their surgical procedure Then, participants will return for 4 visits up to 30 days from the surgery visit.

This study investigates whether early post-surgical healing (1-2 weeks) affects the 12-month clinical and radiographic success of periodontal regenerative therapy, and identifies patient-related, site-specific, and technique-related factors associated with optimal early wound healing, in patients with Stage III-IV periodontitis.

The goal of this observational study is to assess the relationship between female hormonal status and postoperative wound healing in reduction mammaplasty. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does wound healing differ depending on whether the operation takes place before or after ovulation in the menstrual cycle? 2. Does estradiol have a positive effect on wound healing? Participants with mammary hypertrophy will undergo reduction mammaplasty, and the investigators will measure their hormonal profile (LH, FSH, and estradiol) on the day of surgery.

This is a single-blinded, multicentre, prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing post-operative and patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing application of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) after sinus tract excision as compared to excision and standard open wound care in chronic pilonidal sinus disease (PSD).

This study evaluates whether a 9-week healing interval is sufficient for subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) maturation after palatal harvesting, and whether topical application of a polynucleotide and hyaluronic acid gel (Regenfast®) improves tissue quality. This is a randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial with a split-mouth design involving 15 participants. Each participant undergoes bilateral SCTG harvesting from the palate in two surgical sessions 9 weeks apart. In the first session, one randomized side receives a single topical application of Regenfast® after graft removal; the contralateral side serves as control. Standardized tissue fragments (3×3 mm, 1.5 mm thickness) are collected from each graft for histological (HE, Picrosirius Red) and immunohistochemical analyses. Comparisons are made between grafts collected at baseline and after 9 weeks, and between sides treated with or without the gel.

A prospective, randomized clinical study with a blinded evaluator to compare a post-surgical abdominal scar care protocol using Ozoaqua products versus standard care in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery. The primary objective is to assess whether the use of Ozoaqua, initiated in the immediate postoperative period according to wound evolution, improves abdominal scar quality at 3 months compared with usual care. The proposed design is an initial single-center study at the Clínica Universidad de Navarra, with 1:1 random allocation to two parallel arms: an intervention group receiving standard care plus Ozoaqua ozonated soap and oil, and a control group receiving standard care only. The primary scar assessment will be performed by a blinded evaluator, while treatment will be open-label due to the nature of the topical intervention. The target population consists of adult patients undergoing scheduled open abdominal surgery, with primary wound closure and an assessable linear abdominal scar. Follow-up will be integrated into routine clinical care, including an in-hospital phase during the first postoperative days and outpatient visits at approximately 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months, with the latter being the main study visit. The primary endpoint will be scar quality at 3 months, assessed using the POSAS scale, particularly the blinded observer score. Secondary endpoints will include the patient POSAS score, scar evolution, wound complications, pain, pruritus, satisfaction, cutaneous adverse events, rescue treatments and adherence.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare primary wound closure (PC) versus delayed primary closure (DPC) after standardized wound decontamination using the High-Efficiency Incision and Drainage with Irrigation (HIEDI) technique in patients undergoing open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in Sana'a, Yemen. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does primary closure with HIEDI result in a non-inferior or lower incidence of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) at 30 days compared with delayed primary closure with HIEDI? * Does primary closure with HIEDI reduce length of hospital stay and improve the trajectory of objective wound healing compared with delayed primary closure with HIEDI? * What is the impact of each closure method on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life? Researchers will compare the two groups to determine the optimal, evidence-based standard of care for wound management in complicated appendicitis within a resource-limited setting. Participants will: * Undergo open appendectomy for intraoperatively confirmed complicated appendicitis (perforation or gangrene). * Receive standardized HIEDI wound decontamination (meticulous debridement and pulsatile irrigation with minimum 500 mL povidone-iodine 1:10 solution). * Be randomly allocated to either primary closure (all layers closed at surgery) or delayed primary closure (skin/subcutaneous tissue left open and closed 3-5 days later). * Attend follow-up visits at days 7, 14, and 30 for wound assessment, infection surveillance, and outcome evaluation.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether oral nifedipine reduces postoperative pain and improves wound healing after hemorrhoidectomy in adult patients aged 18-65 years undergoing elective surgery for grade III or IV hemorrhoids in Sana'a, Yemen. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does oral nifedipine 20 mg twice daily for 14 days reduce postoperative pain compared with placebo? * Does oral nifedipine improve wound healing progression and shorten time to complete healing compared with placebo? Researchers will compare the nifedipine group to the placebo group to see if there is a significant reduction in pain scores, faster wound healing, lower analgesic consumption, and fewer complications. Participants will: * Take either oral nifedipine 20 mg or an identical-looking placebo capsule twice daily for 14 consecutive days, starting 6 hours after surgery. * Report pain intensity using a standard 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale at multiple time points during the first 28 days. * Attend follow-up visits on postoperative days 7, 14, and 28 for wound healing assessment and safety monitoring. * Use rescue analgesia (paracetamol and/or diclofenac) as needed for breakthrough pain.

This study looks at whether a treatment made from a patient's own blood, called platelet-rich plasma (PRP), can help heal the cut made during childbirth (episiotomy) better than standard care alone. PRP is prepared by drawing a small blood sample from the patient and spinning it in a centrifuge to concentrate the platelets, which contain natural healing factors. In this study, women who have an episiotomy during vaginal delivery will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group will receive a single injection of their own PRP at the wound site right after delivery, and the other group will receive the usual standard wound care. Neither group's care will otherwise differ. Researchers will follow each woman for 6 weeks after delivery, checking how well the wound is healing using a standard scoring tool (REEDA score), along with pain levels, any complications like infection or wound reopening, and how satisfied participants are with their recovery. The goal is to find out whether this simple, low-risk treatment using a woman's own blood can speed up healing and reduce discomfort after childbirth.

This study investigates whether infrared thermography, a harmless and non-invasive thermal camera technique, can help monitor how surgical wounds heal after skin surgery. The goal is to detect wound problems earlier, such as infection or delayed healing, and to support doctors in making timely clinical decisions.

This study will investigate the utility of Silk bioprotein, an FDA-approved and readily available post-surgical dressing, as a wound dressing for patients undergoing double-incision mastectomy for female-to-male gender affirmation surgery.

This feasibility and pilot study has two aims. The primary aim is to assess the feasibility of collecting clinical, nutritional, and functional data among adults with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) who are treated at an outpatient wound clinic. Specifically, the study will evaluate recruitment and inclusion rates, the relevance and clinical utility of selected variables, and assess the completeness and reliability of data collection. The secondary aim is to provide a preliminary characterisation of nutritional status, dietary intake, body composition, muscle strength, mobility, and wound-related quality of life, to inform the design and methodology of a future full-scale national study. DFUs are associated with delayed healing, recurrent infections, reduced quality of life, and increased risk of hospitalization and amputation. These conditions are frequently accompanied by systemic inflammation, impaired circulation, and metabolic disturbances, which may increase nutritional requirements and negatively affect wound healing. Despite nutrition being recognized as a modifiable factor of ulcer healing, the nutritional status of individuals with DFUs remains insufficiently characterised, and evidence regarding clinically relevant nutritional deficiencies in this population is limited. Participants will undergo assessment of height, weight, body composition, handgrip strength, and a 24-hour dietary recall interview during an outpatient clinic visit. Nutritional screening questionnaires and patient-reported measures of appetite, nutritional impact symptoms, mobility, and quality of life will be collected through telephone interviews within one week of the clinical visit. Eligible participants are adults (\>18 years) who are referred to the outpatient wound clinic with a hard-to-heal foot ulcer. Participants must be able to communicate in Danish or English.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) versus traditional dressings on the incidence of transplant infection in adult patients undergoing split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) to the lower leg following excision of a skin tumour. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does NPWT reduce the incidence of transplant infection within three months after STSG? Does NPWT improve secondary outcomes such as graft take, reduce reoperations, complications, and resource use? Researchers will compare patients treated with NPWT to patients treated with traditional dressings to see if NPWT results in lower infection rates and better clinical outcomes. Participants will: Undergo excision of a skin tumour on the lower leg followed by STSG. Be randomized to receive either NPWT or traditional dressings applied over the graft. Follow a structured postoperative care and mobilisation schedule. Attend follow-up visits at day 5 and day 14 postoperatively and be monitored through medical record review up to three months after surgery.

This is a Phase 1 research study evaluating the safety and potential benefits of a topical gel called LUT017 in helping skin wounds heal after minor skin procedures. The study will enroll healthy adults who are already scheduled to have two benign (non-cancerous) skin lesions, such as moles, removed as part of routine care. When the lesions are removed, two small wounds will be created. One wound will be treated with LUT017 gel, and the other will be treated with a placebo gel that does not contain active medication. This allows each participant to serve as their own comparison. The study team will monitor how the wounds heal over approximately one week using clinical evaluation, photographs, and safety assessments. LUT017 is a topical medication designed to activate natural skin repair pathways and potentially promote faster healing. The main purpose of this study is to determine whether a single application of LUT017 gel is safe and well tolerated when applied to fresh skin wounds, and to look for early signs that it may improve or speed up wound healing compared to placebo. The primary question this study aims to answer is: Is LUT017 gel safe when applied to acute skin wounds, and does it show preliminary evidence of improving early wound healing in healthy adults? Participants will be followed for about one week after treatment, with blood tests and skin evaluations to monitor for any side effects. The information gathered from this study will help determine whether LUT017 should continue to be developed as a potential treatment to support wound healing.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if postoperative wound complications in the inguinal region of high-risk patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease can be prevented by the intraoperative application of cold atmospheric plasma. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the intraoperative application of cold atmospheric plasma reduce the need for surgical revision of inguinal wounds due to wound healing complications within 3 months postoperatively? Does the intraoperative application of cold atmospheric plasma reduce wound healing complications not requiring revision within 3 months postoperatively? Researchers will compare the application of cold atmospheric plasma to a placebo (a deactivated look-alike device). Participants will: Undergo surgical treatment with femoral artery access due to their peripheral arterial occlusive disease, in accordance with the respective vascular surgery department standard of care. Receive a single application of cold atmospheric plasma or, respectively, placebo in the area of their inguinal access wound during surgery (after subcutaneous closure and prior to skin closure). Be regularly assessed for wound healing during the first postoperative 14 days as part of routine clinical care and undergo a final evaluation at 3 months. They will also be surveyed regarding their quality of life.

When patients undergo minor oral surgery, dentists use various types of stitches (sutures) to help the gums heal. These stitches can be made of different materials, and some might feel more comfortable, cause less pain, or interfere less with eating and speaking than others. The purpose of this study is to compare four commonly used dental suture materials to see which ones patients prefer. Participants in this study will receive four different types of stitches in different areas of their upper jaw after a routine dental procedure. Patients will be asked to report their levels of pain, discomfort, and any difficulties with daily activities like eating and talking on Days 3, 7, and 14 after the procedure. A panel of dental specialists will also examine photos of the healing process to see if one material helps the mouth heal better than others. This research will help dentists choose the best materials to improve patient comfort after oral surgery.

This clinical observational study investigates the dose-response relationship between laser energy intensity and skin damage/repair by applying different parameter sets of fractional ablative (CO2) and non-ablative (M22) lasers to the inner forearms of approximately 20 healthy Chinese female volunteers (aged 18-60, Fitzpatrick skin types III-V) in a single-center, self-controlled design. Each participant receives both laser types on contralateral arms, with four distinct energy/density combinations per laser applied to separate test areas, and the dynamic skin responses are evaluated at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4 hours, 7 days, and 10 days thereafter through clinical assessments (edema, erythema, etc.), standardized photography, high-frequency ultrasound (Dermascan), and objective instrumental measurements of skin color (Chromameter CM26dG), melanin/hemoglobin (Mexameter MX18), and barrier function (TEWL via Vapometer). The collected data will be analyzed using descriptive and comparative statistical methods to characterize the acute injury and recovery profiles, aiming to establish a foundational model for future post-procedure cosmetic intervention research.

This study is a prospective, multicenter, real-world observational study. It aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a combined therapy-autologous epidermal cell suspension followed by biological dressing (porcine xenograft) coverage-for wound repair after dermabrasion or surgical debridement in patients with second-degree burns. A total of 193 patients receiving the combined therapy will be enrolled from multiple hospitals across China. Their outcomes will be compared with 193 matched patients who received conventional treatment alone (e.g., xenograft alone, autologous skin grafting, or standard dressing changes). The primary outcomes include wound healing rate at 4 weeks and time to complete wound closure. Secondary outcomes include scar assessment, pigmentation, functional recovery, quality of life, and safety. Patients will be followed for up to 6 months.

This study is a prospective, multicenter, real-world observational study. It aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of autologous basement membrane regeneration technology (epidermal basal cell suspension prepared using a cell sorting system) for wound repair in patients undergoing skin grafting, flap surgery, or primary suture. A total of 500 patients receiving the cell suspension therapy combined with standard surgical procedures will be enrolled from multiple hospitals across China. Their outcomes will be compared with 500 matched patients receiving standard surgical procedures alone (e.g., skin grafting, flap surgery, or suture without cell suspension). The primary outcomes include complete wound healing rate at 4 weeks (for grafted wounds) and time to complete wound closure (for sutured or flap-repaired wounds). Secondary outcomes include wound area reduction rate, recurrence rate, scar assessment (Vancouver Scar Scale), pain score (ASA), sweat function test, basement membrane integrity (histopathology with collagen IV and VII staining if clinically indicated), and safety. Patients will be followed for up to 6 months.

This study is a prospective, multicenter, real-world observational study. It aims to evaluate whether adding plasma device therapy to standard scar care is effective and safe for treating various types of scars, including hypertrophic scars, keloids, atrophic scars, postoperative scars, burn scars, and post-traumatic scars. A total of 400 patients receiving standard scar care plus plasma therapy will be enrolled from multiple hospitals across China. Their outcomes will be compared with 400 matched patients who received standard scar care alone. The main outcomes include change in Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score, pruritus relief, pain relief, scar thickness reduction, patient satisfaction, recurrence rate at 6 months, and any side effects. Patients will be followed for up to 6 months after treatment completion.

This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating whether periosteal distraction combined with autologous split-thickness skin grafting can significantly improve graft survival rate at postoperative day 14 compared with skin grafting alone in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (Wagner grade 2-3 or post-amputation). A total of 104 eligible patients will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (periosteal distraction + skin grafting, n=52) or the control group (skin grafting alone, n=52). Secondary outcomes include time to complete epithelialization, wound healing quality (BWAT score at 3 months), ulcer recurrence rate (at 6 months), foot function (AOFAS score), quality of life (DFS-SF score), and safety profile. This study aims to address the critical clinical bottleneck of poor graft survival in ischemic wound environments, providing a novel, minimally invasive, and synergistic treatment paradigm for diabetic foot ulcers.

Brief Summary This observational study will follow patients who undergo DIEP flap breast reconstruction to better understand a common surgical challenge called ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. I/R injury can happen when a flap has a period without blood flow (ischemia) and then blood flow returns (reperfusion). This process may trigger inflammation and oxidative stress and is associated with fat necrosis or partial flap loss. 1\. What is being studied 1. The investigators will measure inflammation and oxidative stress markers in blood (for example, interleukin-6 \[IL-6\]) from before surgery through the first 72 hours after surgery. 2. These data will help map the normal and abnormal patterns of recovery after surgery and may inform future approaches to monitoring and protecting flap tissue. 3. No experimental drug or device is given to participants in this study. Separate animal studies are developing a near-infrared imaging and antioxidant nanomaterial (Mn/QD-SAC); this is not used in participants here. 2\. Who can take part 1. Women aged 18-70 scheduled for immediate DIEP flap breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery. 2. Key exclusions include severe heart, liver, or kidney disease; significant clotting problems; active infection or autoimmune disease; long-term use of immunosuppressants/anti-inflammatory drugs; pregnancy or breastfeeding; or other reasons judged by the research team. 3\. What will happen if you join 1. After providing informed consent, participants will have blood drawn at five time points: pre-operative baseline (within 24 hours before surgery) and at 0, 6, 24, and 72 hours after surgery (about 10 mL each time; total \~50 mL). 2. Blood will be processed and stored under secure conditions and tested for inflammation and oxidative stress markers. 3. The investigators will also record routine clinical information from the medical record (such as age, BMI, surgery duration, ischemia time, and clinical assessments of flap outcomes and complications). 4. Participation does not change the participant's clinical care before, during, or after surgery. 4\. Risks and benefits 1. Risks are those of standard blood draws: brief pain, bruising, bleeding, dizziness, and rare infection. 2. There is no direct medical benefit to participants. Results may help improve understanding and future care for patients undergoing flap reconstruction. 5\. Privacy and data protection 1. Samples and data will be coded without names. Identifying information is stored separately with restricted access. 2. Research results are not routinely added to the medical record or returned to participants unless a finding has clear, actionable clinical significance and is approved by the ethics committee. 6\. Time commitment and costs 1. All blood draws occur during the routine hospital stay. There is no additional follow-up required after discharge. 2. There is no cost to participate. 7\. Voluntary participation Joining the study is voluntary. Participants may withdraw at any time without affecting their medical care.

To compare rate of infection and wound healing between chlorhexidine impregnated paraffin gauze and dry povidone-iodine dressings in post-traumatic wounds.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of non-thermal plasma (NTP) as an adjuvant treatment for surgical bed decontamination and accelerated tissue repair in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy. The study aims to address the following objectives: * Does the intraoperative application of NTP to the surgical bed and closed incision promote accelerated tissue regeneration compared to conventional postoperative care? * Does NTP treatment reduce postoperative inflammatory response, pain intensity, and the incidence of site-specific complications (such as surgical site infection or seroma)? * What is the safety profile of helium-based NTP in the cervical anatomical region regarding neighboring neurovascular structures? Participants will be randomized into two arms: 1. The experimental group: Receiving a standardized application of helium-based NTP (at a frequency of 13.56 MHz) to the surgical bed prior to closure and subsequently to the sutured incision. 2. The control group: Receiving standard-of-care surgical wound management. Clinical follow-up will include quantitative assessment of healing rates, pain scales (VAS), and biochemical or clinical markers of inflammation at scheduled intervals (Days 1, 7, 15, and up to 12 weeks post-surgery).

This study is following adult patients with serious burn injuries to better understand how their bodies respond to treatment and recovery. Researchers will collect small amounts of blood and tissue samples, along with information already recorded in the medical record, such as vital signs, lab results, and details of surgeries or complications. The goal is to identify patterns that may help predict who is at higher risk for infections or other problems after a burn injury. This information could lead to new tools, including computer-based models, to improve burn care and outcomes in the future. Participation involves providing samples and allowing researchers to review medical records during the hospital stay and up to one year after discharge.